Comparison of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in category IIIB chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A randomized prospective trial

被引:5
|
作者
Sevim, Mehmet [1 ]
Alkis, Okan [1 ]
Kartal, Ibrahim Gueven [1 ]
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur [1 ]
Ivelik, Halil Ibrahim [1 ]
Aras, Bekir [1 ]
Kabay, Sahin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kutahya Hlth Sci Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Kutahya, Turkiye
[2] Altinbas Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
chronic pelvic pain syndrome; chronic prostatitis; percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; SACRAL NEUROMODULATION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SYMPTOM INDEX; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; URINARY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24513
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a heterogenous condition that impacts the Quality of life severely, and it has multimodal complex treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two well-described neuromodulation therapies, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of category IIIB CP/CPPS. MethodsThis study was designed as a randomized prospective clinical trial. We randomized category IIIB CP/CPPS patients into two treatment groups as TTNS and PTNS groups. Category IIIB CP/CPPS was diagnosed by two or four-glass Meares-Stamey test. All patients included in our study were antibiotic/anti-inflammatory resistant. Transcutaneous and percutaneous treatments were applied 30 min sessions for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated by Turkish-validated National Health Institute Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) initially and after treatment. Treatment success was evaluated within each group and also compared with each other. ResultsA total of 38 patients in the TTNS group and 42 patients in the PTNS group were included in the final analysis. The mean VAS scores of the TTNS group were lower than the PTNS group initially (7.11 and 7.43, respectively), (p = 0.03). The pretreatment NIH-CPSI scores were similar between groups (p = 0.07). VAS scores, total NIH-CPSI, NIH-CPSI micturation, NIH-CPSI pain, and NIH-CPSI QoL scores decreased significantly at the end of the treatment in both groups. We found a significantly higher VAS and NIH-CPSI scores decrease in the PTNS group compared to the TTNS group (p < 0.01). ConclusionBoth PTNS and TTNS are effective treatment methods in category IIIB CP/CPPS. Comparing the two methods, PTNS provided a higher level of improvement in terms of pain and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficiency of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Category IIIB Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Sham-Controlled Comparative Study
    Kabay, Sahin
    Kabay, Sibel Canbaz
    Yucel, Mehmet
    Ozden, Hilmi
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2009, 83 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [2] Clinical Observations of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Combined with Sacral Nerve Root Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Male Chronic Pelvic Pain and Chronic Prostatitis
    Wu, Sihui
    Sun, Xiaoming
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Li, Jiawei
    Yang, Xingyu
    Bao, Yuanyuan
    Yu, Hongchuan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2022, 75 (10): : 813 - 818
  • [3] Randomized trial of long-term effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on chronic pelvic pain
    Ayse Istek
    Funda Gungor Ugurlucan
    Cenk Yasa
    Sule Gokyildiz
    Onay Yalcin
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 290 : 291 - 298
  • [4] Randomized trial of long-term effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on chronic pelvic pain
    Istek, Ayse
    Ugurlucan, Funda Gungor
    Yasa, Cenk
    Gokyildiz, Sule
    Yalcin, Onay
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (02) : 291 - 298
  • [5] Treatment for overactive bladder A meta-analysis of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation
    Yang, Ding-Yuan
    Zhao, Liu-Ni
    Qiu, Ming-Xing
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (20) : E25941
  • [6] Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Symptomatic Management of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Placebo-Control Randomized Trial
    Sikiru, Lamina
    Shmaila, Hanif
    Muhammed, Samani A.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2008, 34 (06): : 708 - 713
  • [7] Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urge Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Shah, Nemi M.
    Lukacz, Emily S.
    Ferrante, Kimberly L.
    Menefee, Shawn A.
    UROGYNECOLOGY, 2025, 31 (03): : 225 - 233
  • [8] Comparison of parasacral transcutaneous electrical stimulation and transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in women with overactive bladder syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
    Mallmann, Suzana
    Ferla, Lia
    Rodrigues, Marina P.
    Paiva, Luciana L.
    Sanches, Paulo R. S.
    Ferreira, Charles F.
    Ramos, Jose Geraldo L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 250 : 203 - 208
  • [9] Efficacy of transcutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve compared to percutaneous stimulation in idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: Randomized control trial
    Ramirez-Garcia, Ines
    Blanco-Ratto, Laia
    Kauffmann, Stephanie
    Carralero-Martinez, Andrea
    Sanchez, Emilia
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (01) : 261 - 268
  • [10] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    O'Connor, Alexander
    Reynolds, Elizabeth
    Molyneux, Clare
    Vasant, Dipesh H.
    Sharma, Abhiram
    Faulkner, Gemma
    McLaughlin, John
    Kiff, Edward
    Telford, Karen
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11