Review of machine learning methods applied to enhanced geothermal systems

被引:11
作者
Wang, Long [1 ]
Yu, Ziwang [1 ]
Zhang, Yanjun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Peiyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Construct Engn, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resource & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
关键词
Enhanced geothermal system; Machine learning; Hot dry rock; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; DISTRICT-HEATING SYSTEM; PREDICTION; ENERGY; WELL; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; SIMULATION; MODEL; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-023-10749-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to summarize the progress in the application of machine learning (ML) to enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), including the entire process of EGS survey, development, and application. This review formed descriptors after identifying keywords and searched the target literature from two highly-reputed and high-usage databases: Web of Science and Scopus. After filtering the duplicates between these databases, the remaining papers were filtered. Papers not on the application of ML to EGS or hot-dry-rock (HDR) fields were excluded. Subsequently, the remaining literature was read and studied. Papers on ML algorithms that have been applied to EGS systems were analyzed. ML methods have been applied to eight factors influencing EGS. Currently, the most common ML method is the artificial neural network (ANN). The Levenberg-Marguardt algorithm had a slightly better advantage over other neural network algorithms in terms of operation optimization and bottom-hole-temperature prediction for geothermal power stations. In the prediction of influencing factors, such as the reservoir temperature and drill speed, shallow ML models, such as XGBoost model based on the decision tree, random forest model, and support vector machine (SVM), often had better prediction ability than the ANN. More importantly, in reservoir temperature prediction, productivity prediction, and geological logging, deep learning (DL) models outperformed shallow ML models, such as ANN and SVM. Notably, in this study, the DL was only used in the prediction of the aforementioned influencing factors. When applied to other influencing factors under the same experimental conditions, the DL and other ML methods are expected to produce the same prediction results. Many factors influence EGS. This study discussed only eight influencing factors provided in the target literature. Other important factors, such as the prediction of reservoir fracture expansion and water loss, were not discussed because ML methods were not applied to them. The DL method can be used for predictions in the analysis of the complex influencing factors of this highly nonlinear relationship. Based on the application effect of DL in other fields, good prediction results can be expected.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic analysis of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). A review of software packages for estimating and simulating costs
    Olasolo, P.
    Juarez, M. C.
    Olasolo, J.
    Morales, M. P.
    Valdani, D.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 104 : 647 - 658
  • [42] Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Methods for Renewable Power Forecasting: A Recent Review
    Alkabbani, Hanin
    Ahmadian, Ali
    Zhu, Qinqin
    Elkamel, Ali
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 3
  • [43] A Review of Deep Learning Methods Applied on Load Forecasting
    Almalaq, Abdulaziz
    Edwards, George
    2017 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA), 2017, : 511 - 516
  • [44] Machine learning methods applied to process qualification
    Herrmann, Mark
    Meusemann, Stefan
    Utzny, Clemens
    34TH EUROPEAN MASK AND LITHOGRAPHY CONFERENCE, 2018, 10775
  • [45] A comprehensive review on mechanical responses of granite in enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs)
    Zhu, Zhennan
    Yang, Shengqi
    Ranjith, Pathegama Gamage
    Tian, Wenling
    Tian, Hong
    Zheng, Jun
    Jiang, Guosheng
    Dou, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 383
  • [46] A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future
    Breede K.
    Dzebisashvili K.
    Liu X.
    Falcone G.
    Geothermal Energy, 1 (1)
  • [47] Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: a literature review
    Ghoroghi, Ali
    Rezgui, Yacine
    Petri, Ioan
    Beach, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (03) : 433 - 456
  • [48] A systematic review of the research trends of machine learning in supply chain management
    Ni, Du
    Xiao, Zhi
    Lim, Ming K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2020, 11 (07) : 1463 - 1482
  • [49] A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Models for Optimizing Wind Power Processes
    Rosca, Cosmina-Mihaela
    Stancu, Adrian
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (07):
  • [50] Comparison of machine learning and statistical methods in the field of renewable energy power generation forecasting: a mini review
    Dou, Yibo
    Tan, Shuwen
    Xie, Dongwei
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11