Review of machine learning methods applied to enhanced geothermal systems

被引:11
作者
Wang, Long [1 ]
Yu, Ziwang [1 ]
Zhang, Yanjun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Peiyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Construct Engn, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resource & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
关键词
Enhanced geothermal system; Machine learning; Hot dry rock; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; DISTRICT-HEATING SYSTEM; PREDICTION; ENERGY; WELL; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; SIMULATION; MODEL; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-023-10749-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to summarize the progress in the application of machine learning (ML) to enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), including the entire process of EGS survey, development, and application. This review formed descriptors after identifying keywords and searched the target literature from two highly-reputed and high-usage databases: Web of Science and Scopus. After filtering the duplicates between these databases, the remaining papers were filtered. Papers not on the application of ML to EGS or hot-dry-rock (HDR) fields were excluded. Subsequently, the remaining literature was read and studied. Papers on ML algorithms that have been applied to EGS systems were analyzed. ML methods have been applied to eight factors influencing EGS. Currently, the most common ML method is the artificial neural network (ANN). The Levenberg-Marguardt algorithm had a slightly better advantage over other neural network algorithms in terms of operation optimization and bottom-hole-temperature prediction for geothermal power stations. In the prediction of influencing factors, such as the reservoir temperature and drill speed, shallow ML models, such as XGBoost model based on the decision tree, random forest model, and support vector machine (SVM), often had better prediction ability than the ANN. More importantly, in reservoir temperature prediction, productivity prediction, and geological logging, deep learning (DL) models outperformed shallow ML models, such as ANN and SVM. Notably, in this study, the DL was only used in the prediction of the aforementioned influencing factors. When applied to other influencing factors under the same experimental conditions, the DL and other ML methods are expected to produce the same prediction results. Many factors influence EGS. This study discussed only eight influencing factors provided in the target literature. Other important factors, such as the prediction of reservoir fracture expansion and water loss, were not discussed because ML methods were not applied to them. The DL method can be used for predictions in the analysis of the complex influencing factors of this highly nonlinear relationship. Based on the application effect of DL in other fields, good prediction results can be expected.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning in Production Planning and Control: A Review of Empirical Literature
    Cadavid, Juan Pablo Usuga
    Lamouri, Samir
    Grabot, Bernard
    Fortin, Arnaud
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 385 - 390
  • [32] Machine learning for international freight transportation management: A comprehensive review
    Barua, Limon
    Zou, Bo
    Zhou, Yan
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34
  • [33] Machine Learning Applied to survival prediction of elderly cancer patients: Systematic Review
    Lacerda, Tiago Beltrao
    Medeiros, Alberto
    Perez, Regis Batista
    Cavalcanti Furtado, Ana Paula
    2020 15TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI'2020), 2020,
  • [34] Applications of machine learning techniques in performance evaluation of solar desalination systems - A concise review
    Rashidi, Saman
    Karimi, Nader
    Yan, Wei-Mon
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2022, 144 : 399 - 408
  • [35] Machine learning methods applied to drilling rate of penetration prediction and optimization - A review
    Barbosa, Luis Felipe F. M.
    Nascimento, Andreas
    Mathias, Mauro Hugo
    de Carvalho, Joao Andrade, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 183
  • [36] Machine learning for drilling applications: A review
    Zhong, Ruizhi
    Salehi, Cyrus
    Johnson, Ray
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 108
  • [37] Data Science in Economics: Comprehensive Review of Advanced Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods
    Nosratabadi, Saeed
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Puhong Duan
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Filip, Ferdinand
    Band, Shahab S.
    Reuter, Uwe
    Gama, Joao
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (10) : 1 - 25
  • [38] Machine Learning Applications in Building Energy Systems: Review and Prospects
    Li, Daoyang
    Qi, Zhenzhen
    Zhou, Yiming
    Elchalakani, Mohamed
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (04)
  • [39] A review on the applicability of machine learning techniques to the metamodeling of energy systems
    Starke, Allan R.
    da Silva, Alexandre K.
    NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART B-FUNDAMENTALS, 2023, : 214 - 243
  • [40] Machine Learning Methods for Automated Fault Detection and Diagnostics in Building Systems-A Review
    Nelson, William
    Culp, Charles
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)