Review of machine learning methods applied to enhanced geothermal systems

被引:11
作者
Wang, Long [1 ]
Yu, Ziwang [1 ]
Zhang, Yanjun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Peiyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Construct Engn, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resource & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
关键词
Enhanced geothermal system; Machine learning; Hot dry rock; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; DISTRICT-HEATING SYSTEM; PREDICTION; ENERGY; WELL; OPTIMIZATION; PENETRATION; SIMULATION; MODEL; STATE;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-023-10749-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to summarize the progress in the application of machine learning (ML) to enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), including the entire process of EGS survey, development, and application. This review formed descriptors after identifying keywords and searched the target literature from two highly-reputed and high-usage databases: Web of Science and Scopus. After filtering the duplicates between these databases, the remaining papers were filtered. Papers not on the application of ML to EGS or hot-dry-rock (HDR) fields were excluded. Subsequently, the remaining literature was read and studied. Papers on ML algorithms that have been applied to EGS systems were analyzed. ML methods have been applied to eight factors influencing EGS. Currently, the most common ML method is the artificial neural network (ANN). The Levenberg-Marguardt algorithm had a slightly better advantage over other neural network algorithms in terms of operation optimization and bottom-hole-temperature prediction for geothermal power stations. In the prediction of influencing factors, such as the reservoir temperature and drill speed, shallow ML models, such as XGBoost model based on the decision tree, random forest model, and support vector machine (SVM), often had better prediction ability than the ANN. More importantly, in reservoir temperature prediction, productivity prediction, and geological logging, deep learning (DL) models outperformed shallow ML models, such as ANN and SVM. Notably, in this study, the DL was only used in the prediction of the aforementioned influencing factors. When applied to other influencing factors under the same experimental conditions, the DL and other ML methods are expected to produce the same prediction results. Many factors influence EGS. This study discussed only eight influencing factors provided in the target literature. Other important factors, such as the prediction of reservoir fracture expansion and water loss, were not discussed because ML methods were not applied to them. The DL method can be used for predictions in the analysis of the complex influencing factors of this highly nonlinear relationship. Based on the application effect of DL in other fields, good prediction results can be expected.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning applied to tourism: A systematic review
    Nunez, Jose Carlos Sancho
    Gomez-Pulido, Juan A.
    Ramirez, Rafael Robina
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2024, 14 (05)
  • [22] Enhanced Geothermal Systems - Promises and Challenges
    Sircar, Anirbid
    Solanki, Krishna
    Bist, Namrata
    Yadav, Kriti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT-IJRED, 2022, 11 (02): : 333 - 346
  • [23] Systematic review of machine learning methods applied to ecoacoustics and soundscape monitoring
    Nieto-Mora, D. A.
    Rodriguez-Buritica, Susana
    Rodriguez-Marin, Paula
    Martinez-Vargaz, J. D.
    Isaza-Narvaez, Claudia
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (10)
  • [24] Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste
    Ascher, Simon
    Watson, Ian
    You, Siming
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 155
  • [25] A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance
    Carvalho, Thyago P.
    Soares, Fabrizzio A. A. M. N.
    Vita, Roberto
    Francisco, Robert da P.
    Basto, Joao P.
    Alcala, Symone G. S.
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 137
  • [26] Literature review: Machine learning techniques applied to financial market prediction
    Henrique, Bruno Miranda
    Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim
    Kimura, Herbert
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 124 : 226 - 251
  • [27] Machine learning-enhanced photocatalysis for environmental sustainability: Integration and applications
    Jaison, Augustine
    Mohan, Anandhu
    Lee, Young-Chul
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 2024, 161
  • [28] Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review
    Stetco, Adrian
    Dinmohammadi, Fateme
    Zhao, Xingyu
    Robu, Valentin
    Flynn, David
    Barnes, Mike
    Keane, John
    Nenadic, Goran
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 133 : 620 - 635
  • [29] Review of Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction and Reconstruction of Metabolic Pathways
    Shah, Hayat Ali
    Liu, Juan
    Yang, Zhihui
    Feng, Jing
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 8
  • [30] Machine Learning in Production Planning and Control: A Review of Empirical Literature
    Cadavid, Juan Pablo Usuga
    Lamouri, Samir
    Grabot, Bernard
    Fortin, Arnaud
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 385 - 390