A Data-driven Robust Model for Day-ahead Operation Planning of Microgrids Considering Distributed Energy Resources and Demand Response

被引:0
作者
Filho, Mauro Obladen de Lara [1 ]
Pinto, Rafael Silva [1 ]
De Aquino, Cyntia Cristinne Correa Baia [1 ]
Unsihuay-Vila, Clodomiro [1 ]
Tabarro, Fabricio H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Engenharia Eletr, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] COPEL Distribuicao, Dept Tecnologia Qualidade Canais Atendimento, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Operation Planning; Microgrids; Data-Driven Robust Optimization; Demand Response; Distributed Energy Resources; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1590/1678-4324-2023220245
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The optimization of microgrids present challenges such as managing distributed energy resources (DERs) and the high reliance on intermittent generation such as PV and wind turbines, which present an aleatory behavior. The most popular techniques to deal with the uncertainties are stochastic optimization, which comes with a high computational burden, and adaptive robust optimization (ARO), which is often criticized for the conservativeness of its solutions. In response to these drawbacks, this work proposes a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model using a data-driven robust optimization approach (DDRO) solved by a two-stage decomposition using the column-and-constraint generation algorithm (C&CG). The DDRO model uses historic data to create the bounds of its uncertainty set, eliminating the conservativeness created by the arbitrary definition of the uncertainty set that is seen in ARO while maintaining a low computational burden. The DDRO model applied was not previously utilized in MGs, only in bulk power systems. A benchmark MG system was simulated for a 24-hour period without uncertainties, with uncertainties using ARO (15% uncertainty budget) and with uncertainties and DDRO. The operational costs without uncertainty were $124,600,60, while the ARO approach rose those costs by 32.5% ($ 165,137.18). Finally, the DDRO approach managed to keep the costs in $ 126,934.54, a mere 1.8% increase from the base case without uncertainty. All simulations were performed in less than 1 minute. The results confirm a) the advantages of bounding the uncertainty set with historical data instead of an arbitrary definition of bounds and b) the fast-converging times of DDRO.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A Benchmark Test System for Networked Microgrids [J].
Alam, Mahamad Nabab ;
Chakrabarti, Saikat ;
Liang, Xiaodong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 16 (10) :6217-6230
[2]   Optimal scheduling of plug-in electric vehicles and renewable micro-grid in energy and reserve markets considering demand response program [J].
Aliasghari, Parinaz ;
Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam ;
Alipour, Manijeh ;
Abapour, Mehdi ;
Zare, Kazem .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 186 :293-303
[3]   Modeling of start-up and shut-down power trajectories of thermal units [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (03) :1562-1568
[4]  
Delfino F, 2019, IEEE T IND APPL
[5]   Adaptive robust optimization framework for day-ahead microgrid scheduling [J].
Ebrahimi, Mohammad Reza ;
Amjady, Nima .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2019, 107 :213-223
[6]   Islanding-Aware Robust Energy Management for Microgrids [J].
Guo, Yuanxiong ;
Zhao, Chaoyue .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (02) :1301-1309
[7]  
Jin M, 2017, APPL ENERG
[8]   A parallel multi-period optimal scheduling algorithm in microgrids with energy storage systems using decomposed inter-temporal constraints [J].
Kim, Tae Hyun ;
Shin, Hansol ;
Kwag, Kyuhyeong ;
Kim, Wook .
ENERGY, 2020, 202
[9]  
Liu G, 2016, POWER ENERGY SOC
[10]  
Mehdizadeh A, 2018, APPL ENERG