How collaboration influences the effect of note-taking on writing performance and recall of contents

被引:7
作者
Fanguy, Mik [1 ]
Baldwin, Matthew [2 ]
Shmeleva, Evgeniia [3 ]
Lee, Kyungmee [4 ]
Costley, Jamie [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, EFL Dept, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, EFL Program, Daejeon, South Korea
[3] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Inst Educ, Moscow, Russia
[4] Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster, England
关键词
Collaborative note-taking; collaborative writing; higher education; retention; LECTURE NOTES; INFORMATION; NOTETAKING; LONGHAND; LAPTOP;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2021.1950772
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Note-taking is a commonly applied pedagogical strategy across all areas of education. In higher education specifically, there has been an increasing push to get students involved in collaborative note-taking in order to increase their engagement with the contents and to inspire deeper and more meaningful learning. However, there is a lack of clarity as to whether collaborative note-taking positively influences student performance. For this reason, the present study (n = 189) compares the learning performances of students in a collaborative note-taking condition to those of students in an individual note-taking condition. The students were compared in regards to their retention of information and their performance on academic writing. The study found that students from the collaborative note-taking group performed better on measures of retention, while the individual note-taking group performed better on measures of academic writing. These results suggest that while the collaborative processes of group note-taking lead students to retain more information, these processes do not lead to better performance in academic writing. The present study fills a gap in the research by showing how the effectiveness of collaborative note-taking might depend on the learning context or on the desired result of the class.
引用
收藏
页码:4057 / 4071
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory
    Abel, Magdalena
    Baeuml, Karl-Heinz T.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2017, 45 (08) : 1319 - 1334
  • [2] Model-Based Characterization of Text Discourse Content to Evaluate Online Group Collaboration
    Adeniran, Adetunji
    Masthoff, Judith
    Beacham, Nigel
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2019, PT II, 2019, 11626 : 3 - 8
  • [3] The Effects of Collaborative Note-Taking in Flipped Learning Contexts
    Baldwin, Matthew P.
    Fanguy, Mik
    Costley, Jamie H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2019, 5 (04): : 25 - 35
  • [4] A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
    Basden, BH
    Basden, DR
    Bryner, S
    Thomas, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (05) : 1176 - 1191
  • [5] Exploring the Complementary Features of Audio and Text Notes for Video-based Learning in Mobile Settings
    Chen, Si
    Wang, Dennis
    Huang, Yun
    [J]. EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'21), 2021,
  • [6] Clabough Erin B D, 2016, J Undergrad Neurosci Educ, V15, pA85
  • [7] Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: the interplay of completeness and interaction
    Costley, Jamie
    Fanguy, Mik
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (02): : 655 - 671
  • [8] CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
  • [9] What Can Interaction Sequences Tell Us About Collaboration Quality in Small Learning Groups?
    Doberstein, Dorian
    Hecking, Tobias
    Hoppe, H. Ulrich
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WEB-BASED LEARNING - ICWL 2019, 2019, 11841 : 61 - 71
  • [10] Doo MY, 2020, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V21, P60