The demands of populism on business and the creation of "corporate political obligations"

被引:11
作者
Hartwell, Christopher A. [1 ,2 ]
Devinney, Timothy M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kozminski Univ, Dept Int Management, Warsaw, Poland
[2] ZHAW Sch Management & Law, Int Business, Winterthur, Switzerland
[3] Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Int Business, Manchester, England
关键词
Populism; Stakeholder capitalism; Nonmarket strategies; Corporate political obligations; Political risk; LEGITIMATE DISTINCTIVENESS; EMERGING ECONOMIES; STRATEGY; FIRMS; TRUMP; DETERMINANTS; ORGANIZATION; MOBILIZATION; CONNECTIONS; CORRUPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102075
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Populism is an ideologically fluid political vehicle which increases political risk and forces firms to adapt. As populist parties claim to speak exclusively for the people, any activities that could be perceived as going against populist ideals or leaders are problematic from the corporate point of view. These obligations need not require firms to actively support the populist party or to champion causes dear to the populists, as they may simply expect that firms refrain from challenging the status quo. But these expectations can alter firm operations and planning, particularly intangible activities such as corporate social responsibility, making a firm divert resources away from what it may desire to compete in the economic marketplace and forcing it instead to compete in the social and political marketplace. In this paper, we explore these obligations imposed on firms and term them corporate political obligations (CPO), a specific type of corporate political activity but one which is imposed from the outside. Through our examination, we find that CPO is the dark side of stakeholder capitalism, with states utilizing power to claim rights within the marketplace that are not theirs to claim.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]   Corporate Dystopia: The Ethics of Corporate Political Spending [J].
Alzola, Miguel .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2013, 52 (03) :388-426
[2]   Political connections and stock returns: evidence from the Boulangist campaign, 1888-1889 [J].
Angel Ortiz-Serrano, Miguel .
FINANCIAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2018, 25 (03) :323-356
[3]   Partisanship, elite messages, and support for populism in power [J].
Aytac, S. Erdem ;
Carkoglu, Ali ;
Elci, Ezgi .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 13 (01) :23-39
[5]   The use and abuse of participatory governance by populist governments [J].
Batory, Agnes ;
Svensson, Sara .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2019, 47 (02) :227-244
[6]   Populist discourse and entrepreneurship: The role of political ideology and institutions [J].
Bennett, Daniel L. ;
Boudreaux, Christopher ;
Nikolaev, Boris .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2023, 54 (01) :151-181
[7]   A Distant Mirror: Nineteenth-Century Populism, Nativism, and Contemporary Right-Wing Radical Politics [J].
Betz, Hans-Georg .
DEMOCRACY & SECURITY, 2013, 9 (03) :200-220
[8]   Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value [J].
Bhagwat, Yashoda ;
Warren, Nooshin L. ;
Beck, Joshua T. ;
Watson, George F. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2020, 84 (05) :1-21
[9]   Populist Syndrome and Nonmarket Strategy [J].
Blake, Daniel J. ;
Markus, Stanislav ;
Martinez-Suarez, Julio .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 61 (02) :525-560
[10]   The Comparative Political Economy of Growth Models: Explaining the Continuity of FDI-Led Growth in Ireland and Hungary* [J].
Bohle, Dorothee ;
Regan, Aidan .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2021, 49 (01) :75-106