Multiobjective optimization of a pressurized water reactor cogeneration plant for nuclear hydrogen production

被引:11
作者
Tanbay, Tayfun [1 ]
Durmayaz, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Nat Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Mimar Sinan Campus, TR-16310 Bursa, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Energy Inst, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Nuclear hydrogen production; Multiobjective optimization; Pressurized water reactor; High-temperature steam; electrolysis; Cogeneration; HIGH-TEMPERATURE ELECTROLYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; STEAM ELECTROLYSIS; PRODUCTION OPTIONS; ENERGY; GENERATION; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM; MODEL; EXERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.001
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper, energy, exergy, economic analysis and multiobjective optimization of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) nuclear cogeneration plant for hydrogen production through high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) are carried out. HTSE requires energy in the form of both heat and electrical work. A novel parameter, namely the heat/total energy ratio, is defined, and used as a decision variable in optimization. In addition to energy ratio, hydrogen production capacity, reactor thermal power, live steam temperature, reheating mass flow rate ratio, reheating temperature and steam extraction location are considered as the decision variables to simultaneously optimize the thermal efficiency, thermal-to-hydrogen efficiency, utilization factor, exergy efficiency and total revenue of the cogeneration plant. The analysis and optimization focus on the secondary cycle of the PWR and the effects of hydrogen and electricity prices and ambient conditions are also taken into account since these prices have a significant impact on the optimum design. For a hydrogen price of 4 $/kg and an electricity price of 0.1 $/kWh, when equal preference is given to all objective functions, the optimum production capacity is 6.778 kg/s. The energy ratio has an optimum value if the optimization focuses exclusively on the thermal efficiency and total revenue.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 65
页数:17
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production using a standalone high-temperature electrolyzer [J].
AlZahrani, Abdullah A. ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (27) :13899-13907
[2]   Performance evaluation of hydrogen production based on off-peak electric energy of the nuclear power plant [J].
Aminov, R. Z. ;
Bairamov, A. N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (34) :21617-21625
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Global hydrogen review 2022, DOI [DOI 10.1787/A15B8442-EN, 10.1787/a15b8442-en]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Hydrogen.
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, IAEATECDOC1085
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, GLOBAL ENERGY REV 20, DOI DOI 10.1787/6DCD2-15-EN
[7]   A generic methodology to evaluate economics of hydrogen production using energy from nuclear power plants [J].
Antony, Anil ;
Maheshwari, N. K. ;
Rao, A. Rama .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (41) :25813-25823
[8]   The influence of condenser cooling water temperature on the thermal efficiency of a nuclear power plant [J].
Attia, Sami I. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 80 :371-378
[9]   Leveraging nuclear power-to-green hydrogen production potential in India: A country perspective [J].
Bhattacharyya, Rupsha ;
Singh, Krishna Kumar ;
Bhanja, Kalyan ;
Grover, Ravi Bhushan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (13) :18901-18918
[10]   Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (33) :21559-21570