Using normalization process theory to evaluate the use of patient-centred outcome measures in specialist palliative home care-a qualitative interview study

被引:2
|
作者
Lehmann-Emele, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Jansky, Maximiliane [2 ]
Clapham, Sabina [3 ]
de Wolf-Linder, Susanne [4 ,5 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [1 ]
Hodiamont, Farina [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Georg August Univ Goettingen, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Palliat Med, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Wollongong, Australian Hlth Serv Res Inst, Palliat Care Outcomes Collaborat, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Nursing, Sch Hlth Sci, Winterthur, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hull, Wolfson Palliat Care Res Ctr, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
Specialist palliative home care; Patient-centred outcome measurement; Complexity; Qualitative research; Quality of care; Normalization process theory; Implementation; OF-LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-023-01329-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundStandardised use of patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) improves aspects of quality of care. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) considers the social (inter-)actions of implementation processes operationalised through four constructs: coherence-building, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. The aim of the study was to identify barriers and enablers for the successful use of PCOMs in specialist palliative home care (SPHC) using NPT, to collect clinically meaningful and reliable data to improve patient outcomes.MethodsQualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care professionals from German SPHC teams who participated in a study using PCOMs. Data were analysed using Framework analysis, and contextualised within NPT.ResultsSeventeen interviews across five teams were conducted. Some teams already had an understanding of what PCOMs are and how to use them, based on previous experience. In other teams, this understanding developed through the perception of the benefits (coherence). Participation and engagement depended on individuals and was decisive for coherence-building. The attitude of the management level also played a major role (cognitive participation). Integration of PCOMs into everyday clinical practice varied and depended on the manifestation of the first two constructs and other already established routines (collective action). In the context of appraisal, both positive (e.g. focus on patient) and negative aspects (e.g. additional work) of using PCOMs were mentioned (reflexive monitoring).ConclusionsAlthough benefits of using PCOMs were partly recognised, not all teams continued standardised use. Here, not only the social (inter-)actions, but also the influence of the context (working environment) were decisive. Future implementation strategies should consider integrating PCOMs in existing electronic patient records, education sessions supporting coherence-building, internal facilitators/local champions, and ensuring frequent data analyses as it is beneficial and increases the readiness of using PCOMs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Using Normalization Process Theory to Evaluate an End-of-Life Pediatric Palliative Care Web-Based Training Program for Nurses: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Al-Shammari, Moustafa A.
    Yasir, Amean
    Aldoori, Nuhad
    Mohammad, Hussein
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (11):
  • [22] “You need a team”: perspectives on interdisciplinary symptom management using patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis care—a qualitative study
    Brigitte Baragar
    Kara Schick-Makaroff
    Braden Manns
    Shannan Love
    Maoliosa Donald
    Maria Santana
    Bonnie Corradetti
    Juli Finlay
    Jeffrey A. Johnson
    Michael Walsh
    Meghan J. Elliott
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [23] Empowered or challenged? The dual impact of condition-specific electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the person-centred care of women with breast cancer: A qualitative study
    Hansen, Stine Thestrup
    Jorgensen, Lone
    Schmidt, Volker-Jurgen
    Orsted, Lotte Gebhard
    Piil, Karin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2024, 73
  • [24] Exploring the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems in primary care on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to stimulate quality improvement in physiotherapist practice; a qualitative study.
    Meerhoff, Guus A.
    van Dulmen, Simone A.
    Maas, Marjo J. M.
    Bakker-Jacobs, Annick
    Nijhuis-Van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 37 (09) : 993 - 1004
  • [25] What are the anticipated benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators to implementing person-centred outcome measures into routine care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions? A qualitative interview study with key stakeholders
    Scott, Hannah May
    Coombes, Lucy
    Braybrook, Debbie
    Haroardottir, Daney
    Roach, Anna
    Bristowe, Katherine
    Bluebond-Langner, Myra
    Fraser, Lorna K.
    Downing, Julia
    Farsides, Bobbie
    Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
    Ellis-Smith, Clare
    Harding, Richard
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 38 (04) : 471 - 484