Factors influencing delayed discharge after day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the DeDiLaCo study protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Cillara, N. [1 ]
Fransvea, P. [2 ]
Sechi, R. [1 ]
Cicalo, E. [3 ]
Sotgiu, G. [4 ]
Provenzano, M. [1 ]
Poillucci, G. [5 ]
Agnes, A. [6 ]
Podda, M. [7 ]
机构
[1] PO SS Trin, Dept Surg, Cagliari, Italy
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Emergency Surg & Trauma, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Sassari, Dept Architecture Design & Urban Planning, Sassari, Italy
[4] Univ Sassari, Dept Med Surg & Expt Sci, Sassari, Italy
[5] Policlin Univ Umberto I, Rome, Italy
[6] Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, UOC Chirurg Colecisti & Parete Addominale, Rome, Italy
[7] Univ Cagliari, Dept Surg Sci, Cagliari, Italy
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Early discharge; Delayed discharge; Outcomes; Predictive factors; Multicenter study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for most benign gallbladder diseases. Early discharge (<24 hours) has the same outcomes as longer (>24 hours) hospital stay. Nevertheless, the rate of delayed discharge >24 hours range from 4.6% to 37%. The primary endpoint of this Italian nationwide study is to analyze the prevalence of patients undergoing elective LC who experienced a delayed discharge >24 hours and identify potential limiting factors of early discharge. Results from these analyses will be used to select patients who can be safely discharged on the same day after surgery. Secondary end-points will be to evaluate the patient's quality of life (QoL), assess the direct health costs associated with late discharge, and quantify the patient's involvement in the treatment process.PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted following a residentled model and the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. All patients were treated according to the local hospital protocol and received routine care as standard therapy. RESULTS: We expected to obtain the enrollment of at least 500 patients based on an assumed difference in discharge delay between the reference and the recruitable population of 6% and the identification of factors related to discharge failure within 24 h. Early discharge after LC leads to advantages both in terms of clinical outcomes and quality of life of the patient, and it is highly effective in terms of health costs and shortening the waiting list. However, clinical reality differs from the results of randomized studies by a complex series of non-objectionable real-world data influencing treatment plans. Therefore, we expected to identify independent predictors and factors of failure of early discharge.CONCLUSIONS: Clinical reality often differs from randomized trial results. In Italy, the vast majority of delayed discharges after LC may not be related to surgery and can be prevented both with logistical reorganization and with a read-justment of the trust reimbursement policies.
引用
收藏
页码:8245 / 8252
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on the Application Effect of Fast Track Surgery Care Combined With Continuous Care After Discharge in Patients With Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Yu, Jian
    Lin, Xiao
    Chen, Hong
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [22] Quality of Life After Surgery in Candidates of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: A Comparison Study
    Sadati, Leila
    Pazouki, Abdolreza
    Tamannaie, Zeinab
    Pishgahroudsari, Mohadeseh
    Golchini, Ehsan
    Montazeri, Ali
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 19 (02)
  • [23] Monitoring early discharge after laparoscopic colon surgery: an interventional study
    L. van Outersterp
    S. H. H. Laurijs
    Y. El Amraoui
    A. E. Peeters
    E. E. G. Verdaasdonk
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2025, 39 (6) : 3654 - 3661
  • [24] Reasons and Risk Factors for Delayed Discharge After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Opioid-Sparing Discharge Protocol
    Saku, Sami A.
    Makinen, Tatu J.
    Madanat, Rami
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (10) : 2365 - 2370
  • [25] Thirty-Day Unplanned Readmission After Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Western China: A Retrospective Study
    Huang MingJun
    Dai Yan
    Li JiPing
    Ma HongSheng
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (03)
  • [26] Evaluation of Risk Factors Leading to Conversion from Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Surgery: A Retrospective Controlled Study
    Dincer, Burak
    Omeroglu, Sinan
    Tufan, Aydin Eray
    Uzun, Mehmet Ali
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 35 (03): : 204 - 209
  • [27] Cost analysis and risk factors for interval cholecystectomy after bariatric surgery: a national study
    Juo, Yen-Yi
    Khrucharoen, Usah
    Chen, Yijun
    Sanaiha, Yas
    Benharash, Peyman
    Dutson, Erik
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (03) : 368 - 374
  • [28] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is the surgery still safe beyond the 7-day barrier? A multicentric observational study
    Di Martino, Marcello
    Mora-Guzman, Ismael
    Vaello Jodra, Victor
    Sanjuanbenito Dehesa, Alfonso
    Morales-Garcia, Dieter
    Caina Ruiz, Ruben
    Nisa, Francisca Garcia-Moreno
    Mendoza-Moreno, Fernando
    Alonso Batanero, Sara
    Quinones Sampedro, Jose Edecio
    Lora Cumplido, Paola
    Arango Bravo, Altea
    Rubio-Perez, Ines
    Asensio-Gomez, Luis
    Pardo Aranda, Fernando
    i Farrarons, Sara Senti
    Ruiz Moreno, Cristina
    Martinez Moreno, Clara Maria
    Sarriugarte Lasarte, Aingeru
    Prieto Calvo, Mikel
    Aparicio-Sanchez, Daniel
    Perea Del Pozo, Eduardo
    Martin-Perez, Elena
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (01) : 261 - 272
  • [29] Changes in gallbladder surgery: Comparative study 4 years before and 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Jorge Cervantes
    Guillermo Rojas
    Jorge Anton
    World Journal of Surgery, 1997, 21 : 201 - 204
  • [30] Risk factors for 30-day readmission and indication for ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective NSQIP cohort study
    Joy Zhou
    Sivamainthan Vithiananthan
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 2286 - 2296