Can inertial measurement unit sensors evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using functional electrical stimulation?

被引:1
|
作者
d'Andrea, Francesca [1 ]
Taylor, Paul [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Kai [5 ,6 ]
Heller, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sport & Phys Act Res Ctr, Adv Wellbeing Res Ctr AWRC, Sports Engn Res Grp, Sheffield, England
[2] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Dept Clin Sci & Biomed Engn, Natl Clin FES Ctr, Salisbury, England
[3] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Poole, England
[4] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Odstock Med Ltd, Salisbury, England
[5] Etexsense, Southampton, England
[6] Univ Southampton, Winchester Sch Art, Southampton, England
来源
关键词
drop foot; foot kinematics; functional electrical stimulation; gait analysis; inertial measurement unit; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; GAIT KINEMATICS; MOTION; EXPERIENCE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2023.1225086
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The accuracy of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in measuring foot motion in the sagittal plane has been previously compared to motion capture systems for healthy and impaired participants. Studies analyzing the accuracy of IMUs in measuring foot motion in the frontal plane are lacking. Drop foot patients use functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve walking and reduce the risk of tripping and falling by improving foot dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate if IMUs can estimate foot angles in the frontal and sagittal planes to help understand the effects of FES on drop foot patients in clinical settings. Two Gait Up sensors were used to estimate foot dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion angles in 13 unimpaired participants and 9 participants affected by drop foot while walking 6 m in a straight line. Unimpaired participants were asked to walk normally at three self-selected speeds and to simulate drop foot. Impaired participants walked with and without FES assistance. Foot angles estimated by the IMUs were compared with those measured from a motion capture system using curve RMSE and Bland Altman limits of agreement. Between participant groups, overall errors of 7.95 degrees +/- 3.98 degrees, -1.12 degrees +/- 4.20 degrees, and 1.38 degrees +/- 5.05 degrees were obtained for the dorsi-plantar flexion range of motion, dorsi-plantar flexion at heel strike, and inversion-eversion at heel strike, respectively. The between-system comparison of their ability to detect dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion differences associated with FES use on drop foot patients provided limits of agreement too large for IMUs to be able to accurately detect the changes in foot kinematics following FES intervention. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate IMU accuracy in the estimation of foot inversion-eversion and analyze the potential of using IMUs in clinical settings to assess gait for drop foot patients and evaluate the effects of FES. From the results, it can be concluded that IMUs do not currently represent an alternative to motion capture to evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using FES.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ANALYSIS OF EMG OF PLANTAR AND DORSAL FLEXION OF FOOT IN HEMIPLEGIC PATIENTS TO EVALUATE RESULTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION TREATMENT
    VISSER, SL
    ZILVOLD, G
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 44 (01): : 121 - 121
  • [42] Long-term outcomes of semi-implantable functional electrical stimulation for central drop foot
    Lars Buentjen
    Andreas Kupsch
    Imke Galazky
    Roman Frantsev
    Hans-Jochen Heinze
    Jürgen Voges
    Janet Hausmann
    Catherine M. Sweeney-Reed
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 16
  • [43] Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis: The relevance and importance of addressing quality of movement
    Smith, Angela Davies
    Prokopiusova, Terezie
    Jones, Rosemary
    Burge, Tania
    Rasova, Kamila
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (05) : 653 - 660
  • [44] Functional Electrical Stimulation in a Case of Drop Foot and Atactic Gait: Expert Assessment of Contested Medical Aids
    Schwarze, M.
    Block, J.
    Alimusaj, M.
    Beckmann, N.
    Schiltenwolf, M.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2016, 154 (06): : 624 - 628
  • [45] A hybrid orthosis combining functional electrical stimulation and soft robotics for improved assistance of drop-foot
    Hodgins, Lucy
    Freeman, Chris T.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2023, 115
  • [46] Long-term outcomes of semi-implantable functional electrical stimulation for central drop foot
    Buentjen, Lars
    Kupsch, Andreas
    Galazky, Imke
    Frantsev, Roman
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Voges, Juergen
    Hausmann, Janet
    Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 16 (1)
  • [47] Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation device for foot drop due to stroke
    Do, An H.
    Wang, Po T.
    King, Christine E.
    Schombs, Andrew
    Cramer, Steven C.
    Nenadic, Zoran
    2012 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2012, : 6414 - 6417
  • [48] Response and Prediction of Improvement in Gait Speed From Functional Electrical Stimulation in Persons With Poststroke Drop Foot
    O'Dell, Michael W.
    Dunning, Kari
    Kluding, Patricia
    Wu, Samuel S.
    Feld, Jody
    Ginosian, Jivan
    McBride, Keith
    PM&R, 2014, 6 (07) : 587 - 601
  • [49] Examination of Gait Disorders in Hemiparesis Patients Using Foot-Mounted Inertial Sensors
    Zhao, Hongyu
    Wang, Zhelong
    Qiu, Sen
    Yang, Ning
    Shen, Yanming
    COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING, AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 463 : 1967 - 1974
  • [50] Impact-Aware Foot Motion Reconstruction and Ramp/Stair Detection Using One Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit
    Wang, Yisen
    Fehr, Katherine H.
    Adamczyk, Peter G.
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (05)