Can inertial measurement unit sensors evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using functional electrical stimulation?

被引:1
|
作者
d'Andrea, Francesca [1 ]
Taylor, Paul [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Kai [5 ,6 ]
Heller, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sport & Phys Act Res Ctr, Adv Wellbeing Res Ctr AWRC, Sports Engn Res Grp, Sheffield, England
[2] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Dept Clin Sci & Biomed Engn, Natl Clin FES Ctr, Salisbury, England
[3] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Poole, England
[4] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Odstock Med Ltd, Salisbury, England
[5] Etexsense, Southampton, England
[6] Univ Southampton, Winchester Sch Art, Southampton, England
来源
关键词
drop foot; foot kinematics; functional electrical stimulation; gait analysis; inertial measurement unit; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; GAIT KINEMATICS; MOTION; EXPERIENCE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2023.1225086
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The accuracy of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in measuring foot motion in the sagittal plane has been previously compared to motion capture systems for healthy and impaired participants. Studies analyzing the accuracy of IMUs in measuring foot motion in the frontal plane are lacking. Drop foot patients use functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve walking and reduce the risk of tripping and falling by improving foot dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate if IMUs can estimate foot angles in the frontal and sagittal planes to help understand the effects of FES on drop foot patients in clinical settings. Two Gait Up sensors were used to estimate foot dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion angles in 13 unimpaired participants and 9 participants affected by drop foot while walking 6 m in a straight line. Unimpaired participants were asked to walk normally at three self-selected speeds and to simulate drop foot. Impaired participants walked with and without FES assistance. Foot angles estimated by the IMUs were compared with those measured from a motion capture system using curve RMSE and Bland Altman limits of agreement. Between participant groups, overall errors of 7.95 degrees +/- 3.98 degrees, -1.12 degrees +/- 4.20 degrees, and 1.38 degrees +/- 5.05 degrees were obtained for the dorsi-plantar flexion range of motion, dorsi-plantar flexion at heel strike, and inversion-eversion at heel strike, respectively. The between-system comparison of their ability to detect dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion differences associated with FES use on drop foot patients provided limits of agreement too large for IMUs to be able to accurately detect the changes in foot kinematics following FES intervention. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate IMU accuracy in the estimation of foot inversion-eversion and analyze the potential of using IMUs in clinical settings to assess gait for drop foot patients and evaluate the effects of FES. From the results, it can be concluded that IMUs do not currently represent an alternative to motion capture to evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using FES.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An EMG-control functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for restoration of gait in foot drop patients
    Sabut, S. K.
    Manjunatha, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 12 (01) : 84 - 96
  • [22] Experiences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot-drop in people with multiple sclerosis
    Bulley, Catherine
    Mercer, Thomas H.
    Hooper, Julie E.
    Cowan, Paula
    Scott, Sasha
    van der Linden, Marietta L.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 10 (06) : 458 - 467
  • [23] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION VERSUS ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSES FOR FOOT-DROP: A META-ANALYSIS OF ORTHOTIC EFFECTS
    Prenton, Sarah
    Hollands, Kristen L.
    Kenney, Laurence P. J.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2016, 48 (08) : 646 - 656
  • [24] Effects of timing parameter changes on the gait of functional electrical stimulation users with drop foot
    Marchant, Simon
    Michael, Shona
    Milner, Laura
    Tang, Kit-Tzu
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING, 2019, 6 : 1 - 8
  • [25] Point-to-point repetitive control of functional electrical stimulation for drop-foot
    Page, A. P.
    Freeman, C. T.
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2020, 96 (96)
  • [26] Robust adaptive PID control of functional electrical stimulation for drop-foot correction
    Tanhaei, Ghazal
    Habibi, Hamed
    Holderbaum, William
    Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2024, 153
  • [27] An exploration of the experiences and utility of functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis
    Renfrew, Linda
    Flowers, Paul
    Lord, Anna C.
    Rafferty, Danny
    McFadyen, Angus K.
    Bowers, Roy
    Mattison, Paul
    Paul, Lorna
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (04) : 510 - 518
  • [28] CLINICAL USE OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION FOR CORRECTION OF FOOT DROP: A COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBACUTE AND CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS
    Sabut, Sukanta K.
    Sikdar, Chhanda
    Kumar, Ratnesh
    Mahadevappa, Manjunatha
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 11 (05) : 1165 - 1177
  • [29] User experiences, preferences and choices relating to functional electrical stimulation and ankle foot orthoses for foot-drop after stroke
    Bulley, Catherine
    Shiels, Jane
    Wilkie, Katie
    Salisbury, Lisa
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2011, 97 (03) : 226 - 233
  • [30] Control Strategy With Intra-Step Adaptation for Functional Electrical Stimulation Based Ankle-Foot Orthosis for Drop Foot
    Gouveia, Joao
    Carvalho, Herculano
    van der Kooij, Herman
    Martins, Jorge
    2024 10TH IEEE RAS/EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS, BIOROB 2024, 2024, : 1535 - 1540