Can inertial measurement unit sensors evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using functional electrical stimulation?

被引:1
|
作者
d'Andrea, Francesca [1 ]
Taylor, Paul [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Kai [5 ,6 ]
Heller, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sport & Phys Act Res Ctr, Adv Wellbeing Res Ctr AWRC, Sports Engn Res Grp, Sheffield, England
[2] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Dept Clin Sci & Biomed Engn, Natl Clin FES Ctr, Salisbury, England
[3] Bournemouth Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Poole, England
[4] Salisbury Dist Hosp, Odstock Med Ltd, Salisbury, England
[5] Etexsense, Southampton, England
[6] Univ Southampton, Winchester Sch Art, Southampton, England
来源
关键词
drop foot; foot kinematics; functional electrical stimulation; gait analysis; inertial measurement unit; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; GAIT KINEMATICS; MOTION; EXPERIENCE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2023.1225086
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The accuracy of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in measuring foot motion in the sagittal plane has been previously compared to motion capture systems for healthy and impaired participants. Studies analyzing the accuracy of IMUs in measuring foot motion in the frontal plane are lacking. Drop foot patients use functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve walking and reduce the risk of tripping and falling by improving foot dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate if IMUs can estimate foot angles in the frontal and sagittal planes to help understand the effects of FES on drop foot patients in clinical settings. Two Gait Up sensors were used to estimate foot dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion angles in 13 unimpaired participants and 9 participants affected by drop foot while walking 6 m in a straight line. Unimpaired participants were asked to walk normally at three self-selected speeds and to simulate drop foot. Impaired participants walked with and without FES assistance. Foot angles estimated by the IMUs were compared with those measured from a motion capture system using curve RMSE and Bland Altman limits of agreement. Between participant groups, overall errors of 7.95 degrees +/- 3.98 degrees, -1.12 degrees +/- 4.20 degrees, and 1.38 degrees +/- 5.05 degrees were obtained for the dorsi-plantar flexion range of motion, dorsi-plantar flexion at heel strike, and inversion-eversion at heel strike, respectively. The between-system comparison of their ability to detect dorsi-plantar flexion and inversion-eversion differences associated with FES use on drop foot patients provided limits of agreement too large for IMUs to be able to accurately detect the changes in foot kinematics following FES intervention. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate IMU accuracy in the estimation of foot inversion-eversion and analyze the potential of using IMUs in clinical settings to assess gait for drop foot patients and evaluate the effects of FES. From the results, it can be concluded that IMUs do not currently represent an alternative to motion capture to evaluate foot kinematics in drop foot patients using FES.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey on foot drop and functional electrical stimulation
    Gareth York
    Samit Chakrabarty
    International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2019, 3 : 4 - 10
  • [2] A survey on foot drop and functional electrical stimulation
    York, Gareth
    Chakrabarty, Samit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 3 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [3] Functional electrical stimulation using voluntary eyeblink for foot drop correction
    Champaty, Biswajeet
    Pal, Kunal
    Dash, Aiswarya
    2013 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING RESEARCH AREAS & 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATIONS & RENEWABLE ENERGY (AICERA/ICMICR), 2013,
  • [4] The Clinical Application of Inertial Measurement Unit in Identification of Foot Drop Symptoms
    Bidabadi, Shiva Sharif
    Murray, Iain
    Lee, Gabriel Yin Foo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE 15TH STUDENT CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SCORED), 2017, : 183 - 186
  • [5] Functional electrical stimulation using microstimulators to correct foot drop: a case study
    Weber, DJ
    Stein, RB
    Chan, KM
    Loeb, GE
    Richmond, FJR
    Rolf, R
    James, K
    Chong, SL
    Thompson, AK
    Misiaszek, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 82 (8-9) : 784 - 792
  • [6] Feasibility of using Lokomat combined with functional electrical stimulation for the rehabilitation of foot drop
    Laursen, Christian B.
    Nielsen, Jorgen F.
    Andersen, Ole K.
    Spaich, Erika G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MYOLOGY, 2016, 26 (03) : 268 - 273
  • [7] Functional Electrical Stimulator for Treatment of Patients with Foot Drop
    Alves, Jamile T. D.
    Rodrigues, Marco A. B.
    Aleixo, Andre F. P.
    XXVI BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, CBEB 2018, VOL 1, 2019, 70 (01): : 213 - 218
  • [8] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC FOOT DROP
    SEARS, ES
    DIMITRIJEVIC, M
    GELBORT, M
    THOI, L
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1986, 20 (01) : 146 - 146
  • [9] Ambulatory Measurement of Foot Kinematics Using Wearable Ultrasonic Sensors
    Qi, Yongbin
    Soh, Cheong Boon
    Gunawan, Erry
    Low, Kay-Soon
    2014 36TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2014, : 6282 - 6285
  • [10] Does Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop Strengthen Corticospinal Connections?
    Everaert, Dirk G.
    Thompson, Aiko K.
    Chong, Su Ling
    Stein, Richard B.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (02) : 168 - 177