Modeling unveils sex differences of signaling networks in mouse embryonic stem cells

被引:1
|
作者
Sultana, Zeba [1 ]
Dorel, Mathurin [2 ]
Klinger, Bertram [2 ]
Sieber, Anja [2 ]
Dunkel, Ilona [1 ]
Bluethgen, Nils [2 ]
Schulz, Edda G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Mol Genet, Otto Warburg Labs, Syst Epigenet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Computat Modelling Med, Berlin, Germany
关键词
cell signaling; mathematical modeling; pluripotency; stem cells; X-chromosome inactivation; X chromosome; X-CHROMOSOME; SELF-RENEWAL; GROUND-STATE; PLURIPOTENCY; INHIBITION; PHOSPHORYLATION; DIFFERENTIATION; PHOSPHATASE; WNT; HYPOMETHYLATION;
D O I
10.15252/msb.202211510
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
For a short period during early development of mammalian embryos, both X chromosomes in females are active, before dosage compensation is ensured through X-chromosome inactivation. In female mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), which carry two active X chromosomes, increased X-dosage affects cell signaling and impairs differentiation. The underlying mechanisms, however, remain poorly understood. To dissect X-dosage effects on the signaling network in mESCs, we combine systematic perturbation experiments with mathematical modeling. We quantify the response to a variety of inhibitors and growth factors for cells with one (XO) or two X chromosomes (XX). We then build models of the signaling networks in XX and XO cells through a semi-quantitative modeling approach based on modular response analysis. We identify a novel negative feedback in the PI3K/AKT pathway through GSK3. Moreover, the presence of a single active X makes mESCs more sensitive to the differentiation-promoting Activin A signal and leads to a stronger RAF1-mediated negative feedback in the FGF-triggered MAPK pathway. The differential response to these differentiation-promoting pathways can explain the impaired differentiation propensity of female mESCs. imageData-driven network reconstruction of the signaling network in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) with one and two X chromosomes shows that the X-chromosome number modulates the response to Activin treatment and MAPK pathway activity.Systematic perturbation experiments and modular response analysis (MRA) are performed to reconstruct the signaling networks in XX and XO mESCs.A novel negative feedback mechanism in the PI3K/AKT pathway via GSK3 is identified.Cells with a single X chromosome are more sensitive to the differentiation-promoting Activin A signal and have a stronger negative feedback in the MAPK pathway. This might explain the delayed differentiation seen in female mESCs. Data-driven network reconstruction of the signaling network in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) with one and two X chromosomes shows that the X-chromosome number modulates the response to Activin treatment and MAPK pathway activity.image
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evidence of Extracellular Vesicles Biogenesis and Release in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
    Cruz, Lilian
    Arevalo Romero, Jenny Andrea
    Prado, Mariana Brandao
    Santos, Tiago G.
    Lopes, Marilene Hohmuth
    STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 2018, 14 (02) : 262 - 276
  • [42] Identification of X-chromosomal genes that drive sex differences in embryonic stem cells through a hierarchical CRISPR screening approach
    Oriana Genolet
    Anna A. Monaco
    Ilona Dunkel
    Michael Boettcher
    Edda G. Schulz
    Genome Biology, 22
  • [43] Cathepsin A regulates pluripotency, proliferation and differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells
    Park, Song
    Huang, Hai
    Kwon, Wookbong
    Kim, Hee-Yeon
    Park, Jin-Kyu
    Han, Jee Eun
    Cho, Gil-Jae
    Han, Se-Hyeon
    Sung, Yonghun
    Ryoo, Zae Young
    Kim, Myoung Ok
    Choi, Seong-Kyoon
    CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND FUNCTION, 2021, 39 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [44] Signaling pathways dictating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells
    Dutta, Debasree
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 57 (9-10) : 667 - 675
  • [45] Basic FGF and Activin/Nodal but not LIF signaling sustain undifferentiated status of rabbit embryonic stem cells
    Honda, Arata
    Hirose, Michiko
    Ogura, Atsuo
    EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 2009, 315 (12) : 2033 - 2042
  • [46] Effect of bisphenol A on pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells and differentiation capacity in mouse embryoid bodies
    Chen, Xiaojiao
    Xu, Bo
    Han, Xiumei
    Mao, Zhilei
    Talbot, Prue
    Chen, Minjian
    Du, Guizhen
    Chen, Aiqin
    Liu, Jiayin
    Wang, Xinru
    Xia, Yankai
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2013, 27 (08) : 2249 - 2255
  • [47] Importance of WNT-dependent signaling for derivation and maintenance of primed pluripotent bovine embryonic stem cells
    Xiao, Yao
    Amaral, Thiago F.
    Ross, Pablo J.
    Soto, Delia A.
    Diffenderfer, Kenneth E.
    Pankonin, Aimee R.
    Jeensuk, Surawich
    Tribulo, Paula
    Hansen, Peter J.
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2021, 105 (01) : 52 - 63
  • [48] Characterization of the Endocannabinoid System in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
    Bari, Monica
    Tedesco, Marianna
    Battista, Natalia
    Pasquariello, Nicoletta
    Pucci, Mariangela
    Gasperi, Valeria
    Scaldaferri, Maria Lucia
    Farini, Donatella
    De Felici, Massimo
    Maccarrone, Mauro
    STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 20 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [49] Identification and Functional Evaluation of Alternative Splice Variants of Dax1 in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Huang, Yi
    Zhang, Chen
    Ruan, Yan
    Tian, Yanping
    Wang, Fengsheng
    Xu, Yixiao
    Yu, Meng
    Wang, Jiangjun
    Cheng, Yuda
    Liu, Lianlian
    Yang, Ran
    Wang, Jiali
    Yang, Yi
    Xiong, Jiaxiang
    Hu, Yan
    Jian, Rui
    Ni, Bing
    Wu, Wei
    Zhang, Junlei
    STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 32 (17-18) : 554 - 564
  • [50] Small Molecule Antagonist of Cell Surface Glycosaminoglycans Restricts Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells in a Pluripotent State
    Huang, Mia L.
    Michalak, Austen L.
    Fisher, Christopher J.
    Christy, Mitchell
    Smith, Raymond A. A.
    Godula, Kamil
    STEM CELLS, 2018, 36 (01) : 45 - 54