Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

被引:5
作者
Bland, Kelcey A. [1 ,2 ]
Mustafa, Reem [1 ,3 ]
McTaggart-Cowan, Helen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Res Inst, Canc Control Res, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
关键词
breast cancer; conjoint analysis; discrete choice experiment; healthcare provider preferences; metastases; oncology; patient preferences; preference elicitation; qualitative research; review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; PALLIATIVE CARE; WOMEN; DISEASE; BURDEN; ATTRIBUTES; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15174331
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Identifying and understanding patient preferences regarding their own care can help to tailor cancer therapies and services to the needs, goals, and values of patients. Currently, research on the preferences of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) regarding their care has not been summarized. Our review aims to summarize all research reporting on the specific preferences of patients with MBC regarding their care to identify important areas for future research. The main finding of the current review is that to-date studies evaluating preferences among patients with MBC are mixed. Most studies on MBC patient preferences have focused on capturing preferences directly relating to cancer treatments. More information on patient preferences for other aspects of MBC care, including supportive care therapies and services that target physical, mental, and emotional quality of life, is needed.Abstract People with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have diverse medical, physical, and psychosocial needs that require multidimensional care. Understanding patient preferences is crucial to tailor treatments, services, and foster patient-centered care. A scoping review was performed to summarize the current evidence on the preferences of people with MBC regarding their care to identify knowledge gaps and key areas for future research. The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases were searched. Twenty studies enrolling 3354 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Thirteen quantitative studies, four mixed methods studies, and three qualitative studies were included. Seven studies captured healthcare provider perspectives; thirteen studies evaluated patient preferences relating specifically to cancer treatments; three studies evaluated preferences relating to supportive care; and four studies evaluated communication and decision-making preferences. The current literature evaluating MBC patient preferences is heterogeneous with a focus on cancer treatments. Future research should explore patient preferences relating to multidisciplinary, multi-modal care that aims to improve quality of life. Understanding MBC patient preferences regarding their comprehensive care can help tailor healthcare delivery, enhance the patient experience, and improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [51] Coping with recurrent breast cancer:: Predictors of distressing symptoms and health-related quality of life
    Sarenmalm, Elisabeth Kenne
    Ohlen, Joakim
    Jonsson, Tommy
    Gaston-Johansson, Fannie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 34 (01) : 24 - 39
  • [52] Self-Management and Transitions in Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
    Schulman-Green, Dena
    Bradley, Elizabeth H.
    Knobf, M. Tish
    Prigerson, Holly
    DiGiovanna, Michael P.
    McCorkle, Ruth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 42 (04) : 517 - 525
  • [53] Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review
    Seghers, Petronella A. L.
    Wiersma, Anke
    Festen, Suzanne
    Stegmann, Mariken E.
    Soubeyran, Pierre
    Rostoft, Siri
    O'Hanlon, Shane
    Portielje, Johanneke E. A.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [54] Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review
    Shrestha, Anne
    Martin, Charlene
    Burton, Maria
    Walters, Stephen
    Collins, Karen
    Wyld, Lynda
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (07) : 1367 - 1380
  • [55] Cancer statistics, 2023
    Siegel, Rebecca L.
    Miller, Kimberly D.
    Wagle, Nikita Sandeep
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2023, 73 (01) : 17 - 48
  • [56] Examining and predicting drug preferences of patients with metastatic breast cancer: using conjoint analysis to examine attributes of paclitaxel and capecitabine
    Smith, Mary Lou
    White, Carol B.
    Railey, Elda
    Sledge, George W., Jr.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 145 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [57] Patient Preferences Regarding Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer-A Conjoint Analysis for Common Taxanes
    Spaich, Saskia
    Kinder, Johanna
    Hetjens, Svetlana
    Fuxius, Stefan
    Gerhardt, Axel
    Suetterlin, Marc
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [58] Physical problems, functional limitations, and preferences for physical therapist-guided exercise programs among Dutch patients with metastatic breast cancer: a mixed methods study
    ten Tusscher, M. R.
    Groen, W. G.
    Geleijn, E.
    Sonke, G. S.
    Konings, I. R.
    Van der Vorst, M. J.
    van Zweeden, A.
    Aaronson, N. K.
    Stuiver, Martijn M.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (08) : 3061 - 3070
  • [59] Living with Metastatic Cancer: A Roadmap for Future Research
    Tometich, Danielle B.
    Hyland, Kelly A.
    Soliman, Hatem
    Jim, Heather S. L.
    Oswald, Laura
    [J]. CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 24
  • [60] Breast Cancer Treatment A Review
    Waks, Adrienne G.
    Winer, Eric P.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (03): : 288 - 300