The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value

被引:14
作者
Galbreath, Jeremy [1 ,4 ]
Chang, Chia-Yang [2 ]
Tisch, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Fac Business & Law, Sch Management & Mkt, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Ming Chuan Univ, Coll Management, Dept Business Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Univ Auckland, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Management & Int Business, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Curtin Univ, Fac Business & Law, Sch Management, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
environmental; information; resource-based view of the firm; services; strategy; sustainability; PORTERS GENERIC STRATEGIES; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; ORGANIZATION DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; GREEN; PERFORMANCE; CONSEQUENCES; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3428
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Demonstration of environmental sustainability is increasingly seen as important to gaining legitimacy, consumer favour and competitive advantage for service firms. To explore this prospect further, we employed resource-based theories to study the effect of a proactive environmental strategy (PES) on environmental practices. We argue that the relationship between a PES and environmental practices is positive yet contingent on the perceived importance of information. Using a sample of 2686 service firms from the third Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey, we found that a PES was positively associated with environmental practices and that perceived external information value positively moderated the PES-environmental practices relationship while perceived internal information value had an insignificant interaction effect. Additional tests provide deeper insight into our predicted relationships. The study makes theoretical, empirical and managerial contributions.
引用
收藏
页码:5420 / 5434
页数:15
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]   Addressing sustainability information needs along supply chains [J].
Akhavan, Roya Manuela ;
Zvezdov, Dimitar .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (04) :643-666
[3]   Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review [J].
Albertini, Elisabeth .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :431-457
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF MANDATORY AND VOLUNTARY REGULATORY PRESSURES ON FIRMS' ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH [J].
Alberto Aragon-Correa, J. ;
Marcus, Alfred A. ;
Vogel, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2020, 14 (01) :339-365
[5]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[6]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[7]  
Aragón-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
[8]   Understanding the influence of environmental production practices on firm performance: a proactive versus reactive approach [J].
Baah, Charles ;
Opoku-Agyeman, Douglas ;
Acquah, Innocent Senyo Kwasi ;
Issau, Kassimu ;
Moro Abdoulaye, Farid Abdel .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (02) :266-289
[9]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[10]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736