Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery

被引:0
作者
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,2 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Ciarlo, Anita [1 ]
Giabbani, Ilaria [1 ]
Novello, Leonardo [1 ]
Balestrieri, Marco [3 ]
Costa, Giacomo [3 ]
Favuzza, Eleonora [4 ]
Mencucci, Rita [4 ]
Taroni, Leonardo [3 ]
Tognetto, Daniele [5 ]
Giglio, Rosa [5 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] AUSL Romagna, Osped Morgagni Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEUROF, Eye Clin, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Trieste, Univ Eye Clin, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
关键词
cataract; monofocal IOLs; patients' preferences; core outcome set; stakeholders; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY; VISION; TRIALS; IOL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision.Methods Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire.Results The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision).Discussion In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What's new in cataract surgery: aspheric intraocular lenses
    Kara-Jose Junior, Newton
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2009, 68 (04) : 195 - 196
  • [22] Enhanced Monofocal Versus Conventional Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery: A Meta-analysis
    Wan, Kelvin H.
    Au, Andrea C. K.
    Kua, Wee Nie
    Ng, Alex L. K.
    Cheng, George P. M.
    Lam, Nai Man
    Chow, Vanissa W. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 38 (08) : 538 - +
  • [23] Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery
    Ong, Hon Shing
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Allan, Bruce D. S.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (05):
  • [24] Randomized contralateral comparison of visual outcomes following implantation of two monofocal aspherical intraocular lenses after cataract surgery
    Zarei-Ghanavati, Siamak
    Monfared, Naeemeh
    Heravian, Javad
    Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
    Hemmatian, Zahra
    Wolffsohn, James S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 1563 - 1571
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing Liu
    Yi Dong
    Yan Wang
    [J]. BMC Ophthalmology, 19
  • [26] Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus
    Corbelli, Eleonora
    Iuliano, Lorenzo
    Bandello, Francesco
    Fasce, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [27] Accommodating intraocular lenses for patients with cataract: a review
    Migliore, Antonio
    Corio, Mirella
    Paone, Simona
    Cerbo, Marina
    Jefferson, Tom
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 6 (04) : 431 - 436
  • [28] Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in rosacea: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
    Sanjana Iyengar
    Paula R. Williamson
    Jochen Schmitt
    Lena Johannsen
    Ian A. Maher
    Joseph F. Sobanko
    Todd V. Cartee
    Daniel Schlessinger
    Emily Poon
    Murad Alam
    [J]. Trials, 17
  • [29] Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in rosacea: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
    Iyengar, Sanjana
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Schmitt, Jochen
    Johannsen, Lena
    Maher, Ian A.
    Sobanko, Joseph F.
    Cartee, Todd V.
    Schlessinger, Daniel
    Poon, Emily
    Alam, Murad
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [30] Automated and subjective refraction with monofocal, multifocal, and EDOF intraocular lenses: review
    Bellucci, Carlo
    Mora, Paolo
    Tedesco, Salvatore Antonio
    Gandolfi, Stefano
    Bellucci, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 49 (06) : 642 - 648