Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Tarricone, Rosanna [1 ,2 ]
Rognoni, Carla [1 ]
Ciarlo, Anita [1 ]
Giabbani, Ilaria [1 ]
Novello, Leonardo [1 ]
Balestrieri, Marco [3 ]
Costa, Giacomo [3 ]
Favuzza, Eleonora [4 ]
Mencucci, Rita [4 ]
Taroni, Leonardo [3 ]
Tognetto, Daniele [5 ]
Giglio, Rosa [5 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Ctr Res Hlth & Social Care Management CERGAS, SDA Bocconi Sch Management, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] AUSL Romagna, Osped Morgagni Pierantoni, Forli, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Child Hlth NEUROF, Eye Clin, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Trieste, Univ Eye Clin, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
关键词
cataract; monofocal IOLs; patients' preferences; core outcome set; stakeholders; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVES; QUALITY; VISION; TRIALS; IOL;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision.Methods Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire.Results The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision).Discussion In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction
    Calladine, Daniel
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    Shah, Sweata
    Leyland, Martin
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09):
  • [12] Accommodative versus monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ong, Hon Shing
    Allan, Bruce D. S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [13] Toric Intraocular Lenses in the Correction of Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kessel, Line
    Andresen, Jens
    Tendal, Britta
    Erngaard, Ditte
    Flesner, Per
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (02) : 275 - 286
  • [14] Improvement of intermediate vision with new monofocal intraocular lenses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Redruello-Guerrero, Pablo
    Rivera-Izquierdo, Mario
    Jimenez-Gutierrez, Carmen
    Jesus Lainez-Ramos-Bossini, Antonio
    Yela, Ruben
    Lopez-Marin, Ignacio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 33 (03) : 1308 - 1319
  • [15] Cataract surgery with new monofocal intraocular lens enhanced for intermediate vision and standard monofocal intraocular lens for retinal disorder
    Hwang, Hye Seong
    Lee, Hwanho
    Park, Jin Hyoung
    Chae, Ju Byung
    Kim, Dong Yoon
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [16] Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Cataract Surgery with Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses: Clareon® vs AcrySof® IQ Monofocal
    Agarwal, Smita
    Thornell, Erin
    OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 15 : 144 - 150
  • [17] Comparing the Effect of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses on Macular Surgery
    Altun, A.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [18] Visual Performances With Monofocal, Accommodating, and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Patients With Unilateral Cataract
    Mesci, Cem
    Erbil, Hasan Hasbi
    Olgun, Ali
    Yaylali, Sevil Ari
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 150 (05) : 609 - 618
  • [19] Combined implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction in cataract patients
    Mayer, S.
    Boehm, T.
    Haeberle, H.
    Pham, D. -T.
    Wirbelauer, C.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2008, 225 (09) : 812 - 817
  • [20] Positioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping review
    Joaquín Fernández
    Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
    Francisco Zamorano-Martín
    Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora
    Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo
    BMC Ophthalmology, 23