Genetic model-based success probability prediction of quantum software development projects

被引:2
作者
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [1 ]
Khan, Arif Ali [2 ]
Shameem, Mohammad [3 ]
Nadeem, Mohammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Lahti Univ Technol, Software Engn Dept, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, M3S Empir Software Engn Res Unit, Oulu 90014, Finland
[3] MIT World Peace Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Applicat Dr Vishwanath Karad, Pune 411038, Maharashtra, India
[4] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Aligarh 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Quantum computing (QC); Quantum software development (QSD); Variables; Prediction model; Genetic algorithm; GUIDELINES; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107352
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context: Quantum computing (QC) holds the potential to revolutionize computing by solving complex problems exponentially faster than classical computers, transforming fields such as cryptography, optimization, and scientific simulations. To unlock the potential benefits of QC, quantum software development (QSD) enables harnessing its power, further driving innovation across diverse domains. To ensure successful QSD projects, it is crucial to concentrate on key variables.Objective: This study aims to identify key variables in QSD and develop a model for predicting the success probability of QSD projects.Methodology: We identified key QSD variables from existing literature to achieve these objectives and collected expert insights using a survey instrument. We then analyzed these variables using an optimization model, i.e., Genetic Algorithm (GA), with two different prediction methods the Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Logistic Regression (LR).Results: The results of success probability prediction models indicate that as the QSD process matures, project success probability significantly increases, and costs are notably reduced. Furthermore, the best fitness rankings for each QSD project variable determined using NBC and LR indicated a strong positive correlation (rs=0.945). The t-test results (t = 0.851, p = 0.402>0.05) show no significant differences between the rankings calculated by the two methods (NBC and LR).Conclusion: The results reveal that the developed success probability prediction model, based on 14 identified QSD project variables, highlights the areas where practitioners need to focus more in order to facilitate the costeffective and successful implementation of QSD projects.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The OpenModelica Integrated Environment for Modeling, Simulation, and Model-Based Development
    Fritzson, Peter
    Pop, Adrian
    Abdelhak, Karim
    Ashgar, Adeel
    Bachmann, Bernhard
    Braun, Willi
    Bouskela, Daniel
    Braun, Robert
    Buffoni, Lena
    Casella, Francesco
    Castro, Rodrigo
    Franke, Ruediger
    Fritzson, Dag
    Gebremedhin, Mahder
    Heuermann, Andreas
    Lie, Bernt
    Mengist, Alachew
    Mikelsons, Lars
    Moudgalya, Kannan
    Ochel, Lennart
    Palanisamy, Arunkumar
    Ruge, Vitalij
    Schamai, Wladimir
    Sjolund, Martin
    Thiele, Bernhard
    Tinnerholm, John
    Ostlund, Per
    [J]. MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2020, 41 (04) : 241 - 285
  • [42] A many objective based feature selection model for software defect prediction
    Mao, Qi
    Zhang, Jingbo
    Zhao, Tianhao
    Cai, Xingjuan
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2024, 36 (19)
  • [43] Text mining based an automatic model for software vulnerability severity prediction
    Malhotra, Ruchika
    Vidushi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (08) : 3706 - 3724
  • [44] Prediction model-based learning adaptive control for underwater grasping of a soft manipulator
    Yang, Hui
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Fang, Xi
    Chen, Xingyu
    Gong, Zheyuan
    Wang, Shiqiang
    Kong, Shihan
    Yu, Junzhi
    Wen, Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 5 (03) : 337 - 353
  • [45] Model-based Distributed Prediction for Contaminant Advection Diffusion Process in Liquid Flow
    Jiang, Deng-Yin
    Hu, Li-Sheng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC 2017), 2017, : 9135 - 9140
  • [46] Prediction model-based learning adaptive control for underwater grasping of a soft manipulator
    Hui Yang
    Jiaqi Liu
    Xi Fang
    Xingyu Chen
    Zheyuan Gong
    Shiqiang Wang
    Shihan Kong
    Junzhi Yu
    Li Wen
    [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2021, 5 : 337 - 353
  • [47] A Framework for Application of Genetic Algorithm to Model-Based Design of Reactive Distillation Process
    Lim, Kai Tun
    Matsumoto, Hideyuki
    Yamaki, Takehiro
    Matsuda, Keigo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2014, 47 (02) : 187 - 194
  • [48] Latency detection in motor responses: A model-based approach with genetic algorithm optimization
    Ramat, Stefano
    Magenes, Giovanni
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (10) : 2015 - 2023
  • [49] Development of Extubation Success Prediction Model for Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage
    Jiang, Yao
    Yu, Yue
    Fan, Jing
    Zhang, Lei
    Ye, Yang
    Hu, Ying-hong
    Su, Li-da
    [J]. CEREBELLUM, 2024, : 2372 - 2382
  • [50] Development of a model-based clinical sepsis biomarker for critically ill patients
    Lin, Jessica
    Parente, Jacquelyn D.
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Blakemore, Amy J.
    LeCompte, Aaron J.
    Pretty, Christopher
    Razak, Normy N.
    Lee, Dominic S.
    Hann, Christopher E.
    Wang, Sheng-Hui
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 102 (02) : 149 - 155