Genetic model-based success probability prediction of quantum software development projects

被引:6
作者
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [1 ]
Khan, Arif Ali [2 ]
Shameem, Mohammad [3 ]
Nadeem, Mohammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Lahti Univ Technol, Software Engn Dept, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, M3S Empir Software Engn Res Unit, Oulu 90014, Finland
[3] MIT World Peace Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Applicat Dr Vishwanath Karad, Pune 411038, Maharashtra, India
[4] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Aligarh 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Quantum computing (QC); Quantum software development (QSD); Variables; Prediction model; Genetic algorithm; GUIDELINES; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107352
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context: Quantum computing (QC) holds the potential to revolutionize computing by solving complex problems exponentially faster than classical computers, transforming fields such as cryptography, optimization, and scientific simulations. To unlock the potential benefits of QC, quantum software development (QSD) enables harnessing its power, further driving innovation across diverse domains. To ensure successful QSD projects, it is crucial to concentrate on key variables.Objective: This study aims to identify key variables in QSD and develop a model for predicting the success probability of QSD projects.Methodology: We identified key QSD variables from existing literature to achieve these objectives and collected expert insights using a survey instrument. We then analyzed these variables using an optimization model, i.e., Genetic Algorithm (GA), with two different prediction methods the Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Logistic Regression (LR).Results: The results of success probability prediction models indicate that as the QSD process matures, project success probability significantly increases, and costs are notably reduced. Furthermore, the best fitness rankings for each QSD project variable determined using NBC and LR indicated a strong positive correlation (rs=0.945). The t-test results (t = 0.851, p = 0.402>0.05) show no significant differences between the rankings calculated by the two methods (NBC and LR).Conclusion: The results reveal that the developed success probability prediction model, based on 14 identified QSD project variables, highlights the areas where practitioners need to focus more in order to facilitate the costeffective and successful implementation of QSD projects.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[31]   Defining the quantum workforce landscape: a review of global quantum education initiatives [J].
Kaur, Maninder ;
Venegas-Gomez, Araceli .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 61 (08)
[32]  
Khan A.A., 2023, P IEEE T COMP SOC SY
[33]  
Khan A. A., 2022, SOFTWARE ARCHITECTUR
[34]   Software architecture for quantum computing systems - A systematic review [J].
Khan, Arif Ali ;
Ahmad, Aakash ;
Waseem, Muhammad ;
Liang, Peng ;
Fahmideh, Mahdi ;
Mikkonen, Tommi ;
Abrahamsson, Pekka .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2023, 201
[35]   Agile trends in Chinese global software development industry: Fuzzy AHP based conceptual mapping [J].
Khan, Arif Ali ;
Shameem, Mohammad ;
Nadeem, Mohammad ;
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 102
[36]   Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of motivators for requirements change management process in global software development [J].
Khan, Arif Ali ;
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem .
JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2020, 32 (04)
[37]   Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development [J].
Khan, Arif Ali ;
Shameem, Mohammad ;
Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan ;
Hussain, Shahid ;
Yan, Xuefeng .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 83
[38]   Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of barriers to process improvement in global software development: Client-vendor perspective [J].
Khan, Arif Ali ;
Keung, Jacky ;
Niazi, Mahmood ;
Hussain, Shahid ;
Ahmad, Awais .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 87 :180-205
[39]   Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering [J].
Kitchenham, BA ;
Pfleeger, SL ;
Pickard, LM ;
Jones, PW ;
Hoaglin, DC ;
El Emam, K ;
Rosenberg, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2002, 28 (08) :721-734
[40]   Dynamic prediction of project success using artificial intelligence [J].
Ko, Chien-Ho ;
Cheng, Min-Yuan .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 133 (04) :316-324