Fit into work! From formalizing governance of gig platform ecosystems to helping gig workers craft their platform work

被引:25
作者
Chen, Jianyu [1 ]
Luo, Jinlian [1 ]
Hu, Wenan [2 ]
Ma, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Inst Talent Dev Strategy, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Wuxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gig economy; Gig platform ecosystem; Platform formalization governance; Performance appraisal; Job crafting; Platform work insecurity climate; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT; ECONOMY; PERCEPTIONS; DESIGN; LABOR; SEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2023.114016
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current governance model of gig platform ecosystems benefits gig platforms and customers, but puts gig workers in the weakest position of the triangular relationship. Thus, gig workers experience difficulty in addressing hardships related to gig work. To this end, we must determine how gig platforms build a governance environment that matches gig workers to help them craft gig work. However, extant studies have remained in the qualitative research surface, lacked a certain empirical insight, and have not clarified the direction to creating an effective platform governance model. Thus, based on such literature, we first conceptualize platform formalization governance. Drawing on person-environment fit theory, the PLS-SEM analysis of 290 data from gig workers finds that platform formalization governance directly promotes gig workers' job crafting and indirectly propels it by improving performance appraisal systems' transparency. However, platform work insecurity climate weakens such an direct/indirect positive relationship. These findings contribute to strategic values and effectiveness of the governance model of gig platform ecosystems, thus balancing interests between gig platforms, gig workers, and customers. Gig platforms should consider appropriately formalizing the current governance model and improving work insecurity climate, which helps gig workers more easily address hardships associated with platform work through job crafting.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Stratified pathways into platform work: Migration trajectories and skills in Berlin's gig economy [J].
Orth, Barbara .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2024, 56 (02) :476-490
[32]   Future-proof work? The experiences of gig economy workers in the Philippines [J].
Caboverde, Christopher Ed ;
Flaminiano, John Paul .
ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2025, 36 (01) :161-186
[33]   Sharing in the gig economy: from equitable work relations to exploitative HRM [J].
Le Brocq, Sophie ;
Hughes, Emma ;
Donnelly, Rory .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2023, 52 (03) :454-469
[35]   The relationship between meaningful work and employability of gig workers: from the perspective of career sustainability [J].
Wu, Jing ;
Wang, Dan .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 44 (05) :3118-3137
[36]   Institutions, Occupations and Connectivity: The Embeddedness of Gig Work and Platform-Mediated Labour Market in Hong Kong [J].
Au-Yeung, Tat Chor ;
Qiu, Jack .
CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 48 (7-8) :1169-1187
[37]   Theorizing autonomy in the platform economy: A study of food delivery gig workers in Latvia [J].
Kesane, Iveta ;
Spurina, Maija .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2025,
[38]   Off-platform Social Networks and Gig Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic in India [J].
Ray, Rajorshi ;
Sam, Jillet Sarah .
JOURNAL OF SOUTH ASIAN DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 18 (03) :359-382
[39]   It depends: Platform dependence, schedule control, and satisfaction among gig workers on Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform [J].
Reynolds, Jeremy ;
Kincaid, Reilly .
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2025, 40 (01) :65-78
[40]   On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms: Gig Care Work Conditions on Two Digital Labour Platform Care Models [J].
Hopwood, Pamela ;
MacEachen, Ellen ;
Bourgeault, Ivy ;
McAiney, Carrie ;
Yanar, Basak ;
Davis, Abbey .
CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2024,