Multi-objective airport slot scheduling incorporating operational delays and multi-stakeholder preferences

被引:10
作者
Katsigiannis, Fotios A. [1 ]
Zografos, Konstantinos G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lancaster Univ Management Sch, Ctr Transport & Logist Cent, Dept Management Sci, Lancaster LA1 4YX, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Multi-objective optimisation; Airport slot scheduling; Airport scheduling; Slot coordination; Mixed integer programming; Multi-criteria decision-making; Operational delays; OPTIMIZATION; ALLOCATION; CAPACITY; NUMBER; TOPSIS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2023.104156
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is a multi-objective, multi-stakeholder decision process that aims to maximise airport capacity utilisation and mitigate delays. Existing ASA studies have considered objectives associated with the slot scheduling process per se without considering the implications of the alternative schedules, represented by the generated efficient frontier, on the operational delays, i.e., the delays that will be encountered when a selected airport schedule will be implemented. Furthermore, one notes the absence of an integrated methodology that incorporates the preferences of all ASA stakeholders/experts in selecting the most preferable airport schedule. This gap becomes more evident when considering the dearth of empirical data with respect to ASA scheduling performance metrics. The ASA framework proposed herein taps the above gaps by considering operational delays and eliciting airport slot schedules through the integration of multi-stakeholder preferences. Computational results using empirical preference data demonstrate the decision-support in determining the most preferable airport slot scheduling solution (or solutions) and its implications on expected delays.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP [J].
Aull-Hyde, R ;
Erdogan, S ;
Duke, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (01) :290-295
[2]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[3]   The Quadrant Shrinking Method: A simple and efficient algorithm for solving tri-objective integer programs [J].
Boland, Natashia ;
Charkhgard, Hadi ;
Savelsbergh, Martin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 260 (03) :873-885
[4]   The L-shape search method for triobjective integer programming [J].
Boland N. ;
Charkhgard H. ;
Savelsbergh M. .
Mathematical Programming Computation, 2016, 8 (2) :217-251
[5]  
Brunsch T., 2014, Theory of Computing, V10, P237, DOI DOI 10.4086/TOC.2014.V010A010
[6]  
Burghouwt G, 2013, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V47, P35
[7]   On using the hypervolume indicator to compare Pareto fronts: Applications to multi-criteria optimal experimental design [J].
Cao, Yongtao ;
Smucker, Byran J. ;
Robinson, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2015, 160 :60-74
[8]   An AHP analysis of air traffic management with target windows [J].
Castelli, Lorenzo ;
Pellegrini, Paola .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (02) :68-73
[9]   Minimum delay or maximum efficiency? Rising productivity of available capacity at airports: Review of current practice and future needs [J].
Cavusoglu, Sabriye Sera ;
Macario, Rosario .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 90
[10]  
Cohon JL., 2004, Multiobjective programming and planning