Does a proactive procedure lead to a higher uptake of predictive testing in families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant? A family cancer clinic evaluation

被引:14
|
作者
Menko, Fred H. [1 ,3 ]
van der Velden, Sophie L. [1 ]
Griffioen, Diana N. [1 ]
Ait Moha, Daoud [1 ]
Jeanson, Kiki N. [1 ]
Hogervorst, Frans B. L. [1 ]
Giesbertz, Noor A. A. [1 ]
Bleiker, Eveline M. A. [1 ,2 ]
van der Kolk, Lizet E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Family Canc Clin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Family Canc Clin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; cascade screening; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; predictive testing; OVARIAN-CANCER; BREAST; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/jgc4.1767
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The uptake of genetic counseling and predictive genetic testing by family members at risk for hereditary tumor syndromes is generally below 50%. To address this issue, a new guideline was introduced in the Netherlands in 2019 that aims to improve the sharing of information within families. In addition to cascade screening supported by follow-up telephone calls with the proband, municipal records were accessed to allow the geneticist to contact at-risk family members directly. We evaluated this procedure in 32 families with a (likely) pathogenic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 variant diagnosed at our hospital between May 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021, comparing current uptake with outcomes achieved for 33 families diagnosed in 2014. Fifteen months after diagnostic testing of the proband, the uptake was 43% (120/277), comparable to the 44% (87/200) registered previously. Among a subgroup of women at 50% risk aged 25-75 years, 71% (47/66) were tested, comparable to an earlier uptake of 69% (59/86). Of the 34 at-risk relatives we contacted directly, 17 (50%) underwent predictive testing. In conclusion, we found no evidence that the new procedure leads to a substantially increased uptake. Future research should be primarily aimed at understanding intrafamilial communication barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 622
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among clinic-based African American families with breast cancer
    Qing Gao
    Gail Tomlinson
    Soma Das
    Shelly Cummings
    Lise Sveen
    James Fackenthal
    Phil Schumm
    Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
    Human Genetics, 2000, 107 : 186 - 191
  • [32] Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in a large, unselected breast cancer cohort
    Li, Jingmei
    Wen, Wei Xiong
    Eklund, Martin
    Kvist, Anders
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Christensen, Helene Nordahl
    Torstensson, Astrid
    Bajalica-Lagercrantz, Svetlana
    Dunning, Alison M.
    Decker, Brennan
    Allen, Jamie
    Luccarini, Craig
    Pooley, Karen
    Simard, Jacques
    Dorling, Leila
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Teo, Soo-Hwang
    Hall, Per
    Borg, Ake
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Czene, Kamila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (05) : 1195 - 1204
  • [33] Relationship of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with cancer burden in the family and tumor incidence
    Eva Esteban Cardeñosa
    Pascual Bolufer Gilabert
    Inmaculada de Juan Jiménez
    Sarai Palanca Suela
    Eva Barragán González
    Virginia González Anguix
    Enrique Lerma Alejos
    Isabel Chirivella González
    Ángel Segura Huerta
    Carmen Guillén Ponce
    Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas
    Dolores Cuevas Cuerda
    Dolores Salas Trejo
    Familial Cancer, 2010, 9 : 291 - 295
  • [34] Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families
    Biesecker, BB
    Ishibe, N
    Hadley, DW
    Giambarresi, TR
    Kase, RG
    Lerman, C
    Struewing, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 93 (04): : 257 - 263
  • [35] Relationship of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with cancer burden in the family and tumor incidence
    Esteban Cardenosa, Eva
    Bolufer Gilabert, Pascual
    de Juan Jimenez, Inmaculada
    Palanca Suela, Sarai
    Barragan Gonzalez, Eva
    Gonzalez Anguix, Virginia
    Lerma Alejos, Enrique
    Chirivella Gonzalez, Isabel
    Segura Huerta, Angel
    Guillen Ponce, Carmen
    Martinez de Duenas, Eduardo
    Cuevas Cuerda, Dolores
    Salas Trejo, Dolores
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2010, 9 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [36] Double heterozygous pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a patient with bilateral metachronous breast cancer
    Mampel, Alejandra
    Sottile, Mayra L.
    Denita-Juarez, Silvina P.
    Vargas, Ana L.
    Vargas-Roig, Laura M.
    CANCER GENETICS, 2022, 260 : 14 - 17
  • [37] Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish families with breast and pancreatic cancer
    Stadler, Zsofia K.
    Salo-Mullen, Erin
    Patil, Sujata M.
    Pietanza, M. Catherine
    Vijai, Joseph
    Saloustros, Emmanouil
    Hansen, Nichole A. L.
    Kauff, Noah D.
    Kurtz, Robert C.
    Kelsen, David P.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Robson, Mark E.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (02) : 493 - 499
  • [38] Screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in eastern Finnish breast/ovarian cancer families
    Hartikainen, J. M.
    Kataja, V.
    Pirskanen, M.
    Arffman, A.
    Ristonmaa, U.
    Vahteristo, P.
    Ryynanen, M.
    Heinonen, S.
    Kosma, V-M
    Mannermaa, A.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2007, 72 (04) : 311 - 320
  • [39] BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations screening in Algerian breast/ovarian cancer families
    Cherbal, Farid
    Bakour, Rabah
    Adane, Saida
    Boualga, Kada
    Benais-Pont, Gaelle
    Maillet, Philippe
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2010, 28 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [40] Characteristics of small breast and/or ovarian cancer families with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2
    M J L Ligtenberg
    F B L Hogervorst
    H W Willems
    P J W Arts
    G Brink
    S Hageman
    E A J Bosgoed
    E Van der Looij
    M A Rookus
    P Devilee
    E M A W Vos
    G Wigbout
    P M Struycken
    F H Menko
    E J Th Rutgers
    E H Hoefsloot
    E C M Mariman
    H G Brunner
    L J Van’t Veer
    British Journal of Cancer, 1999, 79 : 1475 - 1478