Community-Engaged Research Ethics Training (CERET): developing accessible and relevant research ethics training for community-based participatory research with people with lived and living experience using illicit drugs and harm reduction workers

被引:7
作者
Morgan, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Neufeld, Scott D. [3 ]
Holroyd, Heather [2 ,4 ]
Ruiz, Jean [5 ]
Taylor, Tara [6 ,7 ]
Nolan, Seonaid [2 ,8 ]
Glegg, Stephanie [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] BC Ctr Subst Use, 400-1045 Howe St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
[3] Brock Univ, Dept Psychol, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Learning Exchange, 612 Main St, Vancouver, BC V6A 2V3, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Off Res Ethics, 6190 Agron Rd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[6] Overdose Prevent Soc, 390 Columbia St, Vancouver, BC V6A 4J1, Canada
[7] SpencerCreo Fdn, 610 Main St, Vancouver, BC V6A 2V3, Canada
[8] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, T325-2211 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
关键词
Research ethics; Community-based participatory research; Harm reduction; People who use drugs; Rresearch ethics pedagogy; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12954-023-00818-6
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundCommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) can directly involve non-academic community members in the research process. Existing resources for research ethics training can be inaccessible to team members without an academic background and do not attend to the full spectrum of ethical issues that arise through community-engaged research practices. We detail an approach to capacity building and training in research ethics in the context of CBPR with people who use(d) illicit drugs and harm reduction workers in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside neighborhood.MethodsA project team comprised of academic and community experts in CBPR, research ethics, and harm reduction met over five months to develop the Community-Engaged Research Ethics Training (CERET). The group distilled key principles and content from federal research ethics guidelines in Canada, and developed case examples to situate the principles in the context of research with people who use(d) illicit drugs and harm reduction workers. In addition to content related to federal ethics guidelines, the study team integrated additional content related to ethical issues that arise through community-based research, and ethical principles for research in the Downtown Eastside. Workshops were evaluated using a pre-post questionnaire with attendees.ResultsOver the course of six weeks in January-February 2020, we delivered three in-person workshops for twelve attendees, most of whom were onboarding as peer research assistants with a community-based research project. Workshops were structured around key principles of research ethics: respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice. The discussion-based format we deployed allowed for the bi-directional exchange of information between facilitators and attendees. Evaluation results suggest the CERET approach was effective, and attendees gained confidence and familiarity with workshop content across learning objectives.ConclusionsThe CERET initiative offers an accessible approach to fulfill institutional requirements while building capacity in research ethics for people who use(d) drugs and harm reduction workers. This approach recognizes community members as partners in ethical decision making throughout the research process and is aligned with values of CBPR. Building capacity around intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions of research ethics can prepare all study team members to attend to ethical issues that arise from CBPR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   RESEARCH ETHICS EDUCATION FOR COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA [J].
Anderson, Emily E. ;
Solomon, Stephanie ;
Heitman, Elizabeth ;
DuBois, James M. ;
Fisher, Celia B. ;
Kost, Rhonda G. ;
Lawless, Mary Ellen ;
Ramsey, Cornelia ;
Jones, Bonnie ;
Ammerman, Alice ;
Ross, Lainie Friedman .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2012, 7 (02) :3-19
[2]  
[Anonymous], TCPS 2: CORE-2022 (Course on Research Ethics)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TRIC POL STAT ETH CO
[4]   WHAT WOMEN WHO USE DRUGS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT ETHICAL RESEARCH: FINDINGS OF AN EXPLORATORY QUALITATIVE STUDY [J].
Bell, Kirsten ;
Salmon, Amy .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2011, 6 (04) :84-98
[5]  
Boilevin L., 2019, Research 101: A manifesto for ethical research in the Downtown Eastside
[6]   Yet they failed to do so: recommendations based on the experiences of NAOMI research survivors and a call for action [J].
Boyd, Susan .
HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2013, 10
[7]  
CITI Program, About us
[8]  
Culhane D., 2011, Anthropologica, V53, P257
[9]   Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers [J].
Damon, Will ;
Callon, Cody ;
Wiebe, Lee ;
Small, Will ;
Kerr, Thomas ;
McNeil, Ryan .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 176 :85-92
[10]   Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards [J].
Flicker, Sarah ;
Travers, Robb ;
Guta, Adrian ;
McDonald, Sean ;
Meagher, Aileen .
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 84 (04) :478-493