Assessing industrialized countries' environmental sustainability performances using an integrated multi-criteria model and software

被引:10
作者
Kirda, Kadir [1 ]
Aytekin, Ahmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Artvin Coruh Univ, Fac Hopa Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, TR-08100 Hopa, Artvin, Turkiye
关键词
Environmental sustainability; Environmental performance; Multi-criteria decision-making; !text type='Python']Python[!/text; Ka-decision; MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING; KUZNETS CURVE; SELECTION; ENERGY; GLOBALIZATION; CHALLENGE; SUPPORT; QUALITY; INDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-023-03349-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study seeks to identify and highlight the differences in the environmental sustainability and environmental protection practices of industrialized countries. For this purpose, thirty industrialized countries were examined using a multi-criteria integrated decision model based on fourteen environmental sustainability performance criteria. An open-source software based on the Python that allows different multi-criteria decision-making methods to be used through a user-friendly interface was developed for evaluations. The results from the developed software rank Sweden first and India last in their environmental sustainability performances. Sweden stands out notably in terms of negative greenhouse gas emission technologies, afforestation, reforestation, environmental laws, carbon tax, bioenergy, and national consciousness. India, on the other hand, does not appear to handle environmental problems in a timely and appropriate manner considering its large population and development needs. Development, utilization, and expansion of renewable energy sources, waste recycling, waste reduction, proper waste disposal, and prioritization of the development of technologies with zero or negative greenhouse gas emissions have emerged as significant factors for environmentally friendly industrialization.
引用
收藏
页码:17505 / 17550
页数:46
相关论文
共 119 条
[71]   Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability [J].
Mulliner, Emma ;
Malys, Naglis ;
Maliene, Vida .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 59 :146-156
[72]   A quantile analysis of energy efficiency, green investment, and energy innovation in most industrialized nations [J].
Musibau, Hammed Oluwaseyi ;
Adedoyin, Festus Fatai ;
Shittu, Waliu Olawale .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (15) :19473-19484
[73]   A novel assessment of bio-medical waste disposal methods using integrating weighting approach and hesitant fuzzy MOOSRA [J].
Narayanamoorthy, S. ;
Annapoorani, V. ;
Kang, Daekook ;
Baleanu, Dumitru ;
Jeon, Jeonghwan ;
Kureethara, Joseph Varghese ;
Ramya, L. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 275
[74]   Climate Change Acts in Scotland, Austria, Denmark and Sweden: the role of discourse and deliberation [J].
Nash, Sarah Louise ;
Steurer, Reinhard .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2021, 21 (09) :1120-1131
[75]   Review and synthesis of climate change studies in the Himalayan region [J].
Negi, Vikram S. ;
Tiwari, Deep C. ;
Singh, Laxman ;
Thakur, Shinny ;
Bhatt, Indra D. .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (09) :10471-10502
[76]  
Obeidat MS, 2020, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V14, P279
[77]   Measuring countries' environmental sustainability performance - A review and case study of Iceland [J].
Olafsson, Snjolfur ;
Cook, David ;
Davidsdottir, Brynhildur ;
Johannsdottir, Lara .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :934-948
[78]  
Ombler F., 2012, 1000MINDS SOFTWARE
[79]   Investigating the Linkage between Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability in India: Do Agriculture and Trade Openness Matter? [J].
Orhan, Ayhan ;
Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday ;
Genc, Sema Yilmaz ;
Kirikkaleli, Dervis .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
[80]   The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) [J].
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Cirovic, Goran .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (06) :3016-3028