Can Environmental Regulation Improve Labor Allocation Efficiency? Evidence from China's New Environmental Protection Law

被引:1
作者
Gu, Ran [1 ]
He, Zenghua [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Xian 710100, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental regulation; labor allocation efficiency; China's New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL); job transition; regulatory cost; DIRECTED TECHNICAL CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; LIFE EXPECTANCY; PRODUCTIVITY; GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; ECONOMY; IMPACT; JOBS;
D O I
10.3390/su15076058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental regulatory stringency and labor reallocation are two defining features in developing countries. This study empirically estimates the impact of environmental regulation on labor allocation efficiency. We adopt the implementation of New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) as an exogenous shock on environmental regulation to carry out a quasi-natural experiment. We find that the increase in environmental regulatory stringency has a significant and positive impact on labor allocation efficiency. The impact is mainly driven by job transition from heavy polluting industries to non-heavy polluting industries. The heterogeneity analysis results show that NEPL promotes the allocation efficiency of economically developed cities, men, union members, and low- and middle-educated laborers. Our study provides empirical evidence for regionally differentiated environmental regulation policies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Adamchik V.A., 2007, INT J BUS FINANC RES, V1, P41
[2]  
Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
[3]   A simple accounting framework for the effect of resource misallocation on aggregate productivity [J].
Aoki, Shuhei .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2012, 26 (04) :473-494
[4]   Environmental regulation, local legislation and pollution control in China [J].
Bao, Qun ;
Shao, Min ;
Yang, Dali .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (04) :321-339
[5]   Air pollution abatement costs under the Clean Air Act: evidence from the PACE survey [J].
Becker, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) :144-169
[6]   Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) :265-295
[7]   Environmental protection, the economy, and jobs: National and regional analyses [J].
Bezdek, Roger H. ;
Wendling, Robert M. ;
DiPerna, Paula .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) :63-79
[8]   THE INNOVATION-EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS [J].
Calvino, Flavio ;
Virgillito, Maria Enrica .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2018, 32 (01) :83-117
[9]   Curriculum and Ideology [J].
Cantoni, Davide ;
Chen, Yuyu ;
Yang, David Y. ;
Yuchtman, Noam ;
Zhang, Y. Jane .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 125 (02) :338-392
[10]   Can Environmental Regulation Reduce Labor Costs and Improve Business Performance? Evidence From the Air Quality Index [J].
Chai, Kuang-Cheng ;
Huang, Yang ;
Chang, Ke-Chiun ;
Hu, Wen-Jun .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 7