Syntactic complexity features of science research article introductions: Rhetorical-functional and disciplinary variation perspectives

被引:11
作者
Zhou, Wenhui [1 ]
Li, Zhi [1 ]
Lu, Xiaofei [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, 35 Tsinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Appl Linguist, 234 Sparks Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Disciplinary variation; Genre analysis; Research article introductions; Rhetorical functions; Syntactic complexity; LEXICAL BUNDLES; APPLIED LINGUISTICS; WRITING RESEARCH; PHRASE; ENGAGEMENT; QUALITY; GENRE; MODEL; MOVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101212
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
An increasing body of genre analysis research within English for Academic Purposes (EAP) has attended to the relationship between linguistic features and their rhetorical functions in academic writing. Previous studies along this line have focused primarily on lexical or phraseological features and less on syntactic complexity features, with few exceptions. This study contributes to this body of research by investigating the rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in science research article (RA) introductions, using a corpus containing the introduction sections of 300 published RAs in six science disciplines. The corpus samples were annotated for rhetorical move-steps using an adapted version of the Create a Research Space model (Swales, 2004) and analyzed using five indices tapping into different aspects of syntactic complexity. Results showed that the syntactic complexity indices varied significantly among the rhetorical move-steps but remained stable across hard-pure and hard-applied disciplines. Furthermore, science RA writers employed different types of syntactic complexity features more often for achieving different rhetorical functions. The implications of our findings for academic writing research and pedagogy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REGISTER GENRE STYLE, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P 5 INT C LANG RES E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Variation across speech and writing
[4]  
Becher T., 2001, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, V2nd
[5]  
Biber D., 2007, DISCOURSE MOVE USING, P121, DOI DOI 10.1075/SCL.28
[6]  
Biber D., 1999, Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
[7]  
Biber D., 2016, Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511920776, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511920776, 10.1017/cbo9780511920776]
[8]   Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany .
ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS, 2011, 15 :223-250
[9]   CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBJECT MATTER IN DIFFERENT ACADEMIC AREAS [J].
BIGLAN, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 57 (03) :195-203
[10]  
Bulte B., 2012, Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, P21, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.32.02BUL