Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults

被引:1
|
作者
Haber, Erin N. [1 ]
Sonti, Rajiv [1 ,4 ]
Simkovich, Suzanne M. [1 ]
Pike, C. William [2 ]
Boxley, Christian L. [3 ]
Fong, Allan [3 ]
Weintraub, William S. [3 ]
Cobb, Nathan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Hlth Res Inst, Div Healthcare Delivery Res, Washington, DC USA
[4] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Main Bldg,Suite M4200, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
vascular access devices; hemodynamic monitoring; blood pressure; shock; ARTERIAL CATHETERS; MORTALITY; SEPSIS; SCORE; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1177/08850666231225173
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Blood pressure (BP) is routinely invasively monitored by an arterial catheter in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the available data comparing the accuracy of noninvasive methods to arterial catheters for measuring BP in the ICU are limited by small numbers and diverse methodologies.Purpose To determine agreement between invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (IABP) and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) in critically ill patients.Methods This was a single center, observational study of critical ill adults in a tertiary care facility evaluating agreement (<= 10% difference) between simultaneously measured IABP and NIBP. We measured clinical features at time of BP measurement inclusive of patient demographics, laboratory data, severity of illness, specific interventions (mechanical ventilation and dialysis), and vasopressor dose to identify particular clinical scenarios in which measurement agreement is more or less likely.Results Of the 1852 critically ill adults with simultaneous IABP and NIBP readings, there was a median difference of 6 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure (MAP), interquartile range (1-12), P < .01. A logistic regression analysis identified 5 independent predictors of measurement discrepancy: increasing doses of norepinephrine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-1.12] P = .03 for every change in 5 mu g/min), lower MAP value (aOR 0.98 [0.98-0.99] P < .01 for every change in 1 mm Hg), higher body mass index (aOR 1.04 [1.01-1.09] P = .01 for an increase in 1), increased patient age (aOR 1.31 [1.30-1.37] P < .01 for every 10 years), and radial arterial line location (aOR 1.74 [1.16-2.47] P = .04).Conclusions There was broad agreement between IABP and NIBP in critically ill patients over a range of BPs and severity of illness. Several variables are associated with measurement discrepancy; however, their predictive capacity is modest. This may guide future study into which patients may specifically benefit from an arterial catheter.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 671
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blood pressure monitoring in the critically ill patient: A place for noninvasive assessment?
    Sakka, Samir G.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (04) : 1366 - 1367
  • [2] Noninvasive monitors of blood pressure in the critically ill
    Lakhal, Karim
    Martin, Maelle
    Ehrmann, Stephan
    Boulain, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 32 (05) : 367 - 368
  • [3] Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
    Ali Araghi
    Joseph J Bander
    Jorge A Guzman
    Critical Care, 10
  • [4] Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
    Araghi, Ali
    Bander, Joseph J.
    Guzman, Jorge A.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (02):
  • [5] Accuracy and reliability of noninvasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients
    Hirschl, MM
    Binder, M
    Herkner, H
    Bur, A
    Brunner, M
    Seidler, D
    Stuhlinger, HG
    Laggner, AN
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (10) : 1684 - 1689
  • [6] Noninvasive continuous optical monitoring of absolute cerebral blood flow in critically ill adults
    He, Lian
    Baker, Wesley B.
    Milei, Daniel
    Kavuri, Venkaiah C.
    Mesquita, Rickson C.
    Busch, David R.
    Abramson, Kenneth
    Jiang, Jane Y.
    Diop, Mamadou
    St Lawrence, Keith
    Amendolia, Olivia
    Quattrone, Francis
    Balu, Ramani
    Andrew Kofke, W.
    Yodh, Arjun G.
    NEUROPHOTONICS, 2018, 5 (04)
  • [7] Validation of the Vasotrac, a noninvasive blood pressure monitoring device, in pediatric critically ill patients
    Wankum, PC
    Heulitt, M
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A118 - A118
  • [8] Accuracy Of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring In Obese Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vasopressors
    Okoye, O.
    Long, C.
    Delk, M.
    Eissa, K.
    Simeone, F.
    Kheir, F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [9] Accuracy assessment of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in the hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients
    Zhu, Guijun
    Zhang, Kun
    Fu, Yuxin
    Hu, Zhenjie
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (05) : 3506 - 3512
  • [10] Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients
    Stover J.F.
    Stocker R.
    Lenherr R.
    Neff T.A.
    Cottini S.R.
    Zoller B.
    Béchir M.
    BMC Anesthesiology, 9 (1) : 6