Performance analysis of matrix-structured manufacturing systems compared to dedicated flow and reconfigurable manufacturing lines

被引:3
作者
Renna, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basilicata, Sch Engn, Via Ateneo Lucano 10, I-85100 Potenza, Italy
来源
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2024年 / 18卷 / 3-4期
关键词
Matrix structures; Dedicated; Reconfigurable; Production systems; Simulation; FLEXIBILITY; DESIGN; OPERATION; FUTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11740-023-01243-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturing systems encounter various unpredictable external and internal changes that diminish efficiency. These alterations in assembly systems, resulting in variations in processing times, failures, and multiple product types, often lead to issues such as starvation or blocking at workstations. Improving routing flexibility, as opposed to using fixed routing, can enhance the efficiency of assembly lines. A reconfigurable manufacturing system introduces limited routing flexibility, while a matrix-structured manufacturing system (MMS) incorporates complete routing flexibility. This research evaluates the performance of MMS configurations with different levels of flexibility and two allocation rules compared to reconfigurable manufacturing and dedicated systems. The simulation analysis conducted highlights the benefits of MMS compared to reconfigurable and dedicated systems in terms of performance measures and energy consumption. The numerical results emphasize the significant advantages of MMS for both production performance and energy consumption when the setup time accounts for approximately 10% of the average processing time of the tasks. This setup time enables the realization of benefits with a moderate level of machine flexibility within the MMS. However, when the setup time is higher, the reconfigurable system becomes a valid alternative to improve performance.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 642
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Towards a generic design method for reconfigurable manufacturing systems Analysis and synthesis of current design methods and evaluation of supportive tools
    Andersen, Ann-Louise
    Brunoe, Thomas Ditlev
    Nielsen, Kjeld
    Rosio, Carin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2017, 42 : 179 - 195
  • [2] Bergmann S., 2022, SINGAPORE, V2022, P1783, DOI [10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015350, DOI 10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015350]
  • [3] An optimisation model for the dynamic management of cellular reconfigurable manufacturing systems under auxiliary module availability constraints
    Bortolini, Marco
    Ferrari, Emilio
    Galizia, Francesco Gabriele
    Regattieri, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2021, 58 : 442 - 451
  • [4] Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Literature review and research trend
    Bortolini, Marco
    Galizia, Francesco Gabriele
    Mora, Cristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 49 : 93 - 106
  • [5] THE IMPACT OF FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY
    CHEN, FF
    ADAM, EE
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1991, 38 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [6] Product variety management
    ElMaraghy, H.
    Schuh, G.
    ElMaraghy, W.
    Piller, F.
    Schoensleben, P.
    Tseng, M.
    Bernard, A.
    [J]. CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 62 (02) : 629 - 652
  • [7] The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review
    Esmaeilian, Behzad
    Behdad, Sara
    Wang, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2016, 39 : 79 - 100
  • [8] Goppert A, 2021, ADV AUTOMOTIVE PRODU, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_1]
  • [9] Matrix structures for high volumes and flexibility in production systems
    Greschke, P.
    Schoenemann, M.
    Thiede, S.
    Herrmann, C.
    [J]. VARIETY MANAGEMENT IN MANUFACTURING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 47TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2014, 17 : 160 - 165
  • [10] Halubek P, 2011, 44 CIRP C MAN SYST