Effects of pressure and heating rate on coal pyrolysis: A study in simulated underground coal gasification

被引:12
作者
Wu, Fangjie [1 ]
Huang, Siyuan [1 ]
Jiang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Guanchen [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploitat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Chengdu Junchen Xinhuan Energy Technol Ltd, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Underground coal gasification; Pyrolysis; Char production; Solid-state kinetic model; ANN; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; KINETICS; HYDROGEN; RANK; COCOMBUSTION; EVOLUTION; SURFACE; LIGNITE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106179
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a promising technology which in-situ converts coal into fuel gases through controlled chemical reactions. In order to precisely control coal pyrolysis and increase the char yield, it is vital to understand the influences of operating factors such as heating rate and pressure, on coal pyrolysis. In this study, the effects of heating rate and pressure on the char formation of bituminous coal pyrolysis are investigated. The reaction mechanism of coal pyrolysis and the solid-state kinetic model are firstly reviewed. Subsequently, thermal experiments are conducted to study the effects of heating rate and pressure on coal pyrolysis characteristics. Moreover, the connection between the dominant coal pyrolysis reaction type and corresponding solid-state kinetic model is revealed. An empirical model of coal pyrolysis rate, pressure, and heating rate is also developed, which can be used to quantitatively predict pyrolysis rates under varying heating rate and pressure conditions. The results show that the optimal heating rate for char generation is at around 10 degrees C/min. On the other hand, when the pressure exceeds 2 MPa, it will enhance the char production by obstructing the physical release of volatiles and has insignificant impact on the reaction type. This study contributes to our understanding of the coal pyrolysis mechanism, and the proposed empirical model can provide valuable insights for optimizing operating parameters during UCG process.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) :1-12
[2]   TOPOCHEMISTRY OF THERMAL DECOMPOSITIONS OF SOLIDS [J].
BOLDYREV, VV .
THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1986, 100 (01) :315-338
[3]   A distributed activation energy model of thermodynamically inhibited nucleation and growth reactions and its application to the β-δ phase transition of HMX [J].
Burnham, AK ;
Weese, RK ;
Weeks, BL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2004, 108 (50) :19432-19441
[4]   STABILITY OF SOLIDS AND SOLID DOSAGE FORMS [J].
CARSTENSEN, JT .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1974, 63 (01) :1-14
[5]  
Chen J.Y., 1987, J. Chin. Soc. Power Eng., V5, P61
[6]   Gas evolution kinetics of two coal samples during rapid pyrolysis [J].
Chen, L. ;
Zeng, C. ;
Guo, X. ;
Mao, Y. ;
Zhang, Y. ;
Zhang, X. ;
Li, W. ;
Long, Y. ;
Zhu, H. ;
Eiteneer, B. ;
Zamansky, V. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 91 (08) :848-852
[7]   COAL PYROLYSIS KINETICS BY NONISOTHERMAL THERMOGRAVIMETRY [J].
ELDER, JP ;
REDDY, VB .
REACTIVITY OF SOLIDS, 1987, 2 (04) :347-358
[8]   Artificial neural networks: A tutorial [J].
Jain, AK ;
Mao, JC ;
Mohiuddin, KM .
COMPUTER, 1996, 29 (03) :31-+
[9]   High ash coal pyrolysis at different heating rates to analyze its char structure, kinetics and evolved species [J].
Jayaraman, Kandasamy ;
Gokalp, Iskender ;
Bostyn, Stephane .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2015, 113 :426-433
[10]   Co-pyrolysis of coal slime and cattle manure by TG-FTIR-MS and artificial neural network modeling: Pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, gas emission characteristics [J].
Jiang, Chunlong ;
Zhou, Wenliang ;
Bi, Haobo ;
Ni, Zhanshi ;
Sun, Hao ;
Lin, Qizhao .
ENERGY, 2022, 247