Financial constraints and nonlinearity of farm size growth

被引:0
作者
Bojnec, Stefan [1 ]
Ferto, Imre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Primorska, Fac Management Koper, Dept Econ, Koper, Slovenia
[2] Inst Econ, Ctr Econ & Reg Stud, Lorand Eotv Res Network, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Farm growth; Farm size; Nonlinearity of farm size; Liquidity constraints; Farm debt; Dynamic panel model; European union; FAMILY FARMS; LIQUIDITY CONSTRAINTS; DAIRY FARMS; PRODUCTIVITY; SUBSIDIES; CREDIT; INVESTMENT; HUNGARY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1108/JAMR-02-2023-0053
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis article aims to investigate the financial constraints and nonlinearity of farm size growth.Design/methodology/approachFarm size growth is measured with land, labor and output using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) for Hungary and Slovenia. A dynamic panel model is applied to assess financial constraints and nonlinearity of farm size growth.FindingsResults show that, except for land in Slovenia and output in Hungary, liquidity constraints are less important for farm size growth than endogenous factors based on farm size growth expectations and steady farm size restructuring. Smaller farms are growing faster than larger ones. The hypothesis that a higher level of subsidies would increase farm size is not supported for Hungary. When farms reach a certain size, the land area of the largest farms increases. Farm debts in Hungary are linked with land growth and in Slovenia with output growth.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research on the impact of liquidity constraints and subsidies can be conducted at a disaggregate farm-type level to examine whether there is variability in the underlying interlinkages at the farm-type specialization level.Practical implicationsThe implication that farm size growth is dependent on initial size and that smaller farms are growing faster than bigger ones indicates that it is not necessary to favor the fastest growing smaller farms thus supports the application of a non-discriminatory farm size policy for observing farm size structural changes.Originality/valueThe dynamic panel econometric model that incorporates cash flow as a measure of financial constraints provides insight into farm size growth in cross-country comparison in relation to potential farm liquidity constraints, farm debt and the nonlinearity of farm size, which information is of relevance to policy makers and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 172
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Off-farm Income, Credit Constraints, and Farm Investment [J].
Key, Nigel .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (04) :642-663
[22]   Increasing or Decreasing Scale? The Pros and Cons of Farm Size for Financial Sustainability [J].
Georgieva, Vanya .
AGRIS ON-LINE PAPERS IN ECONOMICS AND INFORMATICS, 2024, 16 (02) :39-49
[23]   Farm size and growth in field crop and dairy farms in France, Hungary and Slovenia [J].
Bakucs, Z. ;
Bojnec, S. ;
Ferto, I. ;
Latruffe, L. .
SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2013, 11 (04) :869-881
[24]   Competition and financial constraints: A two-sided story [J].
Bernini, Michele ;
Montagnoli, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2017, 70 :88-109
[26]   Size, Growth, and Survival in the Upper Austrian Farm Sector [J].
Christoph R. Weiss .
Small Business Economics, 1998, 10 :305-312
[27]   Financial structure, firm size and industry growth [J].
Kim, Dong-Hyeon ;
Lin, Shu-Chin ;
Chen, Ting-Cih .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 41 :23-39
[28]   Risk-adjusted farm returns and farm size [J].
Noumir, Ashraf M. ;
Langemeier, Michael R. ;
Mallory, Mindy L. .
AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2023, :528-547
[29]   Impact of financial constraints and financial distress on cash holdings [J].
Bukalska, Elzbieta ;
Maziarczyk, Anna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 59 (01) :13-31
[30]   Firm growth and financial constraints: evidence from a policy-based loan program [J].
Dore, Timothy E. ;
Okazaki, Tetsuji ;
Onishi, Ken ;
Wakamori, Naoki .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2025, 65 (01) :131-162