E-Waste Management: An Analysis under the Perspective of Conflicts and Shared Responsibility

被引:3
作者
Cardoso, Layanne Nara Parente [1 ]
Miranda, Karla Danyelle de Oliveira [2 ]
da Silva, Ednael Francisco Vieira [1 ]
Guarnieri, Patricia [3 ]
Silva Filho, Jose [2 ]
Silva, Lucio Camara [1 ,2 ]
Handfield, Robert
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Acad Agreste, Programa Posgrad Engn Prod, Nucleo Tecnol, BR-55014900 Caruaru, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Acad Agreste, Nucleo Tecnol, BR-55014900 Caruaru, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia UnB, Dept Business Adm, BR-70910900 Brasilia, Brazil
来源
LOGISTICS-BASEL | 2023年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
electronic waste; reverse logistic; systematic literature review; conflict; GMCR; POLICY-MAKING; LOGISTICS; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/logistics7040074
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Background: The Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy establishes the shared responsibility of all actors involved in e-waste generation and management; however, some conflicts of interest need interventions and approaches for preventing them. Objective: This paper proposes using a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system to simulate the analysis and resolution of realistic e-waste management conflicts. Method: A systematic literature review focused on e-waste management, shared responsibility and conflict management was conducted, and a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system was applied to generate a framework to address this context. Results: The need for commitment agreements promoted by government institutions in partnerships with companies involved in the process is essential since the principle of shared responsibility requires educational actions, favoring efficiency in the reverse logistics recovery procedures for e-waste. Understanding the interconnected causes of conflicts and their facets is crucial for effective resolution and prevention, aiding comprehension, focused interventions, and evidence-based decision-making for transformative change amidst conflicting stakeholder objectives in the case of WEEE management. These results can be helpful for academics and practitioners working in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication
    Pagani, Regina Negri
    Kovaleski, Joao Luiz
    Resende, Luis Mauricio
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (03) : 2109 - 2135
  • [22] Constructed Governance as Solution to Conflicts in E-Waste Recycling Networks
    Pedro, Fernanda
    Giglio, Ernesto
    Velazquez, Luis
    Munguia, Nora
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 22
  • [23] The Choice between Crisp and Fuzzy Sets in Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Ambiguous Consequences for Finding Consistent Set Relations
    Rohlfing, Ingo
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2020, 32 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [24] Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers
    Sirisawat, Pornwasin
    Kiatcharoenpol, Tossapol
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 117 : 303 - 318
  • [25] von Neumann J., 2004, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA, DOI [10.1515/9781400829460, DOI 10.1515/9781400829460]
  • [26] Implementation of the WEEE-directive -aEuroparts per thousandeconomic effects and improvement potentials for reuse and recycling in Germany
    Walther, Grit
    Steinborn, Jenny
    Spengler, Thomas Stefan
    Luger, Tobias
    Herrmann, Christoph
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 47 (5-8) : 461 - 474