Overground Robotic Exoskeleton Training for Patients With Stroke on Walking-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:7
|
作者
Leow, Xin Rong Gladys [1 ]
Ng, Si Li Annalyn [1 ]
Lau, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Block MD 11,Level 2,10 Med Dr, Singapore 117597, Singapore
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2023年 / 104卷 / 10期
关键词
Walking; Rehabilitation; Robotic exoskeleton; Stroke; HYBRID ASSISTIVE LIMB; SUBACUTE STROKE; GAIT REHABILITATION; RECOVERY; SPEED; IMPROVEMENT; AMBULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of solely overground robotic exoskeleton (RE) training or overground RE training with conventional rehabilitation in improving walking ability, speed, and endurance among patients with stroke.Data Sources: Nine databases, 5 trial registries, gray literature, specified journals, and reference lists from inception until December 27, 2021.Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials adopting overground robotic exoskeleton training for patients with any phases of stroke on walking-related outcomes were included.Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted items and performed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 1 and certainty of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.Data Synthesis: Twenty trials involving 758 participants across 11 countries were included in this review. The overall effect of overground robotic exoskeletons on walking ability at postintervention (d=0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01, 0.42; Z=2.02; P=.04) and follow-up (d=0.37; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.71; Z=2.12; P=.03) and walking speed at postintervention (d=0.23; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.46; Z=2.01; P=.04) showed significant improvement compared with conventional rehabilitation. Subgroup analyses suggested that RE training should combine with conventional rehabilitation. A preferable gait training regime is <4 times per week over >= 6 weeks for <= 30 minutes per session among patients with chronic stroke and ambulatory status of independent walkers before training. Meta-regression did not identify any effect of the covariates on the treatment effect. The majority of randomized controlled trials had small sample sizes, and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Conclusion: Overground RE training may have a beneficial effect on walking ability and walking speed to complement conventional rehabilitation. Further large-scale and long-term, high-quality trials are recommended to enhance the quality of overground RE training and confirm its sustainability. (c) 2023 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1698 / 1710
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative efficacy of robotic exoskeleton and conventional gait training in patients with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shengye Liu
    Fangyuan Chen
    Jianqiao Yin
    Guanqi Wang
    Liyu Yang
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 22 (1)
  • [32] Robotic-Assisted Gait Training Effect on Function and Gait Speed in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tedla, Jaya Shanker
    Dixit, Snehil
    Gular, Kumar
    Abohashrh, Mohammed
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 81 (3-4) : 103 - 111
  • [33] Efficacy of computerized cognitive training on improving cognitive functions of stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhou, Yuxin
    Feng, Haixia
    Li, Guohong
    Xu, Cuirong
    Wu, Yanping
    Li, Huimin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (03)
  • [34] Fluoxetine for stroke recovery: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mead, Gillian E.
    Legg, Lynn
    Tilney, Russel
    Hsieh, Cheng Fang
    Wu, Simiao
    Lundstrom, Erik
    Rudberg, Ann Sofie
    Kutlubaev, Mansur
    Dennis, Martin S.
    Soleimani, Babak
    Barugh, Amanda
    Hackett, Maree L.
    Hankey, Graeme J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2020, 15 (04) : 365 - 376
  • [35] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of lower limb motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tung, Yi-Chun
    Lai, Chien-Hung
    Liao, Chun-De
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    Chen, Hung-Chou
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (07) : 1102 - 1112
  • [36] Meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials for scalp acupuncture treatment of stroke:A systematic review
    Young-Nim You
    Min-Yeong Song
    Gwang-Cheon Park
    Chang-Su Na
    Jae-Young Han
    Myung-Rae Cho
    Jae-Hong Kim
    JournalofTraditionalChineseMedicine, 2018, 38 (04) : 465 - 479
  • [37] Scalp acupuncture for stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Seung-Jin
    Shin, Byung-Cheul
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Han, Chang-Ho
    Kim, Jong-In
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 5 (02) : 87 - 99
  • [38] Comparative efficacy of gait training for balance outcomes in patients with stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lyu, Tianyi
    Yan, Kang
    Lyu, Jiaxuan
    Zhao, Xirui
    Wang, Ruoshui
    Zhang, Chaoyang
    Liu, Meng
    Xiong, Chao
    Liu, Chengjiang
    Wei, Yulong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Proprioceptive Training for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Yi
    Wu, Zugui
    Chen, Zehua
    Ye, Xiangling
    Chen, Guoqian
    Yang, Jiaman
    Zhang, Peiming
    Xie, Fang
    Guan, Yingxin
    Wu, Jiatao
    Chen, Weijian
    Ye, Zixuan
    Xu, Xuemeng
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [40] Effectiveness of Hydrotherapy on Balance and Paretic Knee Strength in Patients With Stroke A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chae, Choong Sik
    Jun, Ji Hyun
    Im, Sun
    Jang, Yongjun
    Park, Geun-Young
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2020, 99 (05) : 409 - 419