Effects of Compound Salt Concentration on Growth, Physiological and Nutritional Value of Hydroponic Forage Wheat

被引:3
|
作者
Ma, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Jiao [2 ]
Sun, Yu [1 ]
Dong, Yu [1 ]
Cai, Hongyu [1 ]
Raja, Imtiaz Hussain [3 ]
Guo, Tongjun [4 ]
Zhang, Sujiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarim Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Tarim Key Lab Anim Husb Sci & Technol, Alar 843300, Peoples R China
[2] Tarim Univ, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Alar 843300, Peoples R China
[3] Cholistan Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Fac Anim Prod & Technol, Dept Anim Nutr, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan
[4] Xinjiang Acad Anim Sci, Inst Feed Res, Urumqi 830002, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
salt concentration; hydroponic wheat; physiological characteristics; nutritional characteristics; gas production; VITRO GAS-PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; FERMENTATION; DIGESTIBILITY; SALINITY; ALFALFA; SORGHUM; LEVEL; L;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13091833
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
1) Background: Hydroponic forage plays an increasingly important role in animal breeding during winter and spring in arid and cold regions due to its rich nutrient and good palatability. In the present study, the profiles of growth, physiological indexes, nutritional value and in vitro degradation of hydroponic forage cultivated with different salt concentration were evaluated. (2) Methods: The compound salt was extracted from soil surrounding the Tarim River Basin, and five compound salt solution treatment groups (three replicates each) with concentrations of 0%, 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.2% and 1.6% were prepared. Winter wheat seeds were selected as hydroponic forage for germination experiments, and the germination, physiological indicators, nutritional value and in vitro fermentation degradation rate were analyzed. (3) Results: The results showed that the germination and growth of hydroponic herbage were significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited by compound salt concentration higher than 0.8% from the third day. Compared with the 0% concentration group, the chlorophyll content in the 0.4% concentration group was significantly increased (p < 0.05), and contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll were 729.71 mg center dot g (-1), 223.19 mg center dot g (-1) and 952.9 mg center dot g(-1), respectively. The total chlorophyll content in the 0.8% and 1.2% concentration groups were significantly lower than those in the 0% and 0.4% concentration groups (p < 0.05), and in the 1.6% concentration group, the content undetected. With the increase in compound salt concentration, the contents of soluble sugar and proline were significantly increased (p < 0.05). The nutrient compositions were significantly increased (p < 0.05) under the 0.4% and 0.8% concentration groups, in which the content of crude protein in 0.4% concentration group was 15.23%. The results of gas production and fermentation parameters suggested that the 0.8% concentration group could enhance rumen fermentation characteristics. (4) Conclusions: In summary, 0.8% as the upper limit concentration and 0% to 0.4% as the optimal concentration range of compound salt can be considered for cultivating hydroponic forage wheat.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BIOMASS PRODUCTION AND NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF HYDROPONIC GREEN FORAGE OF WHEAT AND OAT
    Cerrillo Soto, Maria Andrea
    Juarez Reyes, Arturo Saul
    Rivera Ahumada, Jose Arnulfo
    Guerrero Cervantes, Maribel
    Ramirez Lozano, Roque Gonzalo
    Bernal Barragan, Hugo
    INTERCIENCIA, 2012, 37 (12) : 906 - 913
  • [2] Harvest times on the nutritional value of hydroponic green barley forage
    Quintanilla, Yovana Aroni
    Quispe, Maritza Arias
    Paco, Jose Luis Contreras
    Fernandez, Alfonso Cordero
    Ccente, James Curasma
    Mendoza, Paul Mayhua
    Quispe, Luz Marina Vilcapaza
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2024, 35 (05):
  • [3] Growth and physiological characteristics of forage bermudagrass in response to salt stress
    Cui, Xinyu
    Chen, Jianmin
    Li, Shuang
    Shao, An
    Fu, Jinmin
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [4] Productivity and nutritional value of barley and wheat forage from Colombian's highlands
    Mancipe-Munoz, Edgar A.
    Vasquez-Venegas, Julio E.
    Castillo-Sierra, Javier
    Ortiz-Cuadros, Ronnal E.
    Avellaneda-Avellaneda, Yesid
    Vargas-Martines, Juan de J.
    AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA, 2021, 32 (01): : 271 - 292
  • [5] Plant Growth Stimulators Improve Two Wheat Cultivars Salt-Tolerance: Insights into Their Physiological and Nutritional Responses
    Talaat, Neveen B.
    Hanafy, Alaa M. A.
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (23):
  • [6] Wheat response to differences in water and nutritional status between zeoponic and hydroponic growth systems
    Steinberg, SL
    Ming, DW
    Henderson, KE
    Carrier, C
    Gruener, JE
    Barta, DJ
    Henninger, DL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (02) : 353 - 360
  • [7] Biomass production and nutritional value of wheat and oat hydroponic forages sowed at three densities.
    Rivera-Ahumada, J. A.
    Juarez-Reyes, A. S.
    Bernal-Barragan, H.
    Cerrillo-Soto, M. A.
    Rios-Rincon, F. G.
    Estrada-Angulo, A.
    Guerrero-Cervantes, M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 644 - 644
  • [8] THE EFFECTS OF SALT AND BORON ON GROWTH OF WHEAT
    HOLLOWAY, RE
    ALSTON, AM
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1992, 43 (05): : 987 - 1001
  • [9] Protocol: optimising hydroponic growth systems for nutritional and physiological analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and other plants
    Simon J Conn
    Bradleigh Hocking
    Maclin Dayod
    Bo Xu
    Asmini Athman
    Sam Henderson
    Lucy Aukett
    Vanessa Conn
    Monique K Shearer
    Sigfredo Fuentes
    Stephen D Tyerman
    Matthew Gilliham
    Plant Methods, 9
  • [10] Protocol: optimising hydroponic growth systems for nutritional and physiological analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and other plants
    Conn, Simon J.
    Hocking, Bradleigh
    Dayod, Maclin
    Xu, Bo
    Athman, Asmini
    Henderson, Sam
    Aukett, Lucy
    Conn, Vanessa
    Shearer, Monique K.
    Fuentes, Sigfredo
    Tyerman, Stephen D.
    Gilliham, Matthew
    PLANT METHODS, 2013, 9