Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

被引:13
作者
Erkin, Yueksel [1 ]
Hanci, Volkan [2 ]
Ozduran, Erkan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] 9 Eylul Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Pain Med, Sch Med, Inciralti Mahallesi Mithatpasa Caddesi 1606 Balco, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
health information; internet; pain; readability; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HEALTH INFORMATION; PAIN; INTERNET; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation." On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword "Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation" and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 +/- 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 +/- 2.85 and 10.53 +/- 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 +/- 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information [J].
Ahmadi, Omid ;
Louw, Jacqueline ;
Leinonen, Heta ;
Gan, Peter Yee Chiung .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 35 (05) :551-554
[2]   Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options [J].
Arif, Nadia ;
Ghezzi, Pietro .
BREAST, 2018, 37 :6-12
[3]   Quality and readability of online information on myofascial pain syndrome [J].
Bagcier, Fatih ;
Yurdakul, Ozan Volkan ;
Temel, Mustafa Huseyin .
JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 25 :61-66
[4]   Accuracy, completeness and accessibility of online information on fibromyalgia [J].
Basavakumar, Deepika ;
Flegg, Mirika ;
Eccles, Jessica ;
Ghezzi, Pietro .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (04) :735-742
[5]   Public Health Communication in Time of Crisis: Readability of On-Line COVID-19 Information [J].
Basch, Corey H. ;
Mohlman, Jan ;
Hillyer, Grace C. ;
Garcia, Philip .
DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2020, 14 (05) :635-637
[6]   The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites [J].
Boyer, C ;
Selby, M ;
Scherrer, JR ;
Appel, RD .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (05) :603-610
[7]   Readability of internet-sourced patient education material related to "labour analgesia" [J].
Boztas, Nilay ;
Omur, Dilek ;
Ozbilgin, Sule ;
Altuntas, Goezde ;
Piskin, Ersan ;
Ozkardesler, Sevda ;
Hanci, Volkan .
MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (45)
[8]   Readability of Consumer Health Information on the Internet: A Comparison of US Government-Funded and Commercially Funded Websites [J].
Cochrane, Zara Risoldi ;
Gregory, Philip ;
Wilson, Amy .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 (09) :1003-1010
[9]   Non-pharmacological treatments for pain relief: TENS and acupuncture [J].
Coutaux, Anne .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2017, 84 (06) :657-661
[10]   How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web?: Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews [J].
Eysenbach, G ;
Köhler, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7337) :573-577