Impacts of glyphosate-based herbicide on leaf stomatal density and biomass production of transgenic soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and corn (Zea mays L.)

被引:1
作者
Brillon, Jerome Bernier [1 ,2 ]
Lucotte, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Tremblay, Gilles [3 ]
Smedbol, Elise [1 ,2 ]
Paquet, Serge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, GEOTOP, Succ Ctr Ville CP 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, Inst Sci Environm, Succ Ctr Ville CP 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[3] Minist Agr Pecheries & Alimentat MAPAQ, Monteregie Est Stn,1355 Daniel Johnson West St,Sui, St Hyacinthe, PQ J2S 8WT, Canada
关键词
Stomatal density; Biomass; Glyphosate; Transgenic crops; Mechanical weeding; RR soybean; RR corn; AMINOMETHYLPHOSPHONIC ACID; GAS-EXCHANGE; POTASSIUM; SALINITY; GROWTH; PLANTS; ABA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYTOTOXICITY; CONDUCTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11738-023-03540-9
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The application of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) for weed management can influence crop physiology, such as stomata-dependant processes (ex. stomatal conductance, transpiration and water use efficiency). However, no information exists about the relationship between GBH and stomatal development. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of GBH applications on stomatal density in glyphosate-resistant crop cultivars. It was conducted in randomized agricultural plots cultivated with Roundup Ready soybean (Pioneer P10T91R(R)) and corn (Pioneer P9675AMXT(R)). The treated crops were exposed to one or two Roundup540(R) applications, at a rate of 1.67 L ha(-1), at different vegetative growth stages (V2 and R1 in soybean; V2 and V4 in corn). Stomatal densities (StoDen) and plant's biomass were measured at different growth stages for corn (V2, V4 and R2) and for soybean (V2, R1 and R4). We observed that single GBH applications on soybean plants were associated with higher StoDen and dry weight. Also, the soybean leaves collected in the control plots were associated with significantly lower values of StoDen, dry weight at R4 stage. Little differences between the treatments were observed in corn plants but treated leaves had higher stomatal densities. Influence of GBH on crop plants vary between adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) surface and growth stage. The results suggest that soybean is more sensitive than corn to GBH applications, which resulted in an obvious change in the development of the stomata after each GBH application. This change on StoDen seems to have a positive influence on the biomass production of plants exposed to GBH compare to the control plants. However, this positive influence is less striking while doubling the applied quantity of GBH.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seedlings response to shading: leaf structure, photosynthesis and proteomic analysis
    Yuanfang Fan
    Junxu Chen
    Zhonglin Wang
    Tingting Tan
    Shenglan Li
    Jiafeng Li
    Beibei Wang
    Jiawei Zhang
    Yajiao Cheng
    Xiaoling Wu
    Wenyu Yang
    Feng Yang
    BMC Plant Biology, 19
  • [22] Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] with preplant herbicide tankmixes in soybean [Glycine max. (L). Merr.]
    Byker, Holly P.
    Soltani, Nader
    Robinson, Darren E.
    Tardif, Francois J.
    Lawton, Mark B.
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 93 (04) : 659 - 667
  • [23] Responses of Leaf Expansion, Plant Transpiration and Leaf Senescence of Different Soybean (Glycine max. (L.) Merr.) Genotypes to Soil Water Deficit
    Kang, Lin
    Debaeke, Philippe
    Schoving, Celine
    Maury, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2024, 210 (05)
  • [24] Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Weed Flora and Productivity of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Crop
    Kakabouki, Ioanna
    Mavroeidis, Antonios
    Kouneli, Varvara
    Karydogianni, Stella
    Folina, Antigolena
    Triantafyllidis, Vassilios
    Efthimiadou, Aspasia
    Roussis, Ioannis
    Zotos, Anastasios
    Kosma, Chariklia
    Katsenios, Nikolaos
    NITROGEN, 2022, 3 (02): : 284 - 297
  • [25] Waterlogging tolerance evaluation methods for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) at the pregermination stage
    Rajendran, Ambika
    Lal, Sanjay Kumar
    Raju, Dhandapani
    Mallikarjun, Bingi Pujari
    Ramlal, Ayyagari
    Sharma, Deepshikha
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2023, 70 (08) : 2451 - 2461
  • [26] QTL analyses of seed weight during the development of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)
    Teng, W.
    Han, Y.
    Du, Y.
    Sun, D.
    Zhang, Z.
    Qiu, L.
    Sun, G.
    Li, W.
    HEREDITY, 2009, 102 (04) : 372 - 380
  • [27] Effects of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis and photoprotection mechanisms in soybean(Glycine max(L.)Merr.)
    WANG Xiao-guang
    ZHAO Xin-hua
    JIANG Chun-ji
    LI Chun-hong
    CONG Shan
    WU Di
    CHEN Yan-qiu
    YU Hai-qiu
    WANG Chun-yan
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14 (05) : 856 - 863
  • [28] QTL analysis of seed-flooding tolerance in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)
    Sayama, Takashi
    Nakazaki, Tetsuya
    Ishikawa, Goro
    Yagasaki, Kazuhiro
    Yamada, Naohiro
    Hirota, Naoko
    Hirata, Kaori
    Yoshikawa, Takanori
    Saito, Hiroki
    Teraishi, Masayoshi
    Okumoto, Yutaka
    Tsukiyama, Takuji
    Tanisaka, Takatoshi
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2009, 176 (04) : 514 - 521
  • [29] EFFECT OF SOWING DATE ON THE YIELD AND SEED QUALITY OF SOYBEAN [GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERR.]
    Jarecki, Waclaw
    Bobrecka-Jamro, Dorota
    JOURNAL OF ELEMENTOLOGY, 2021, 26 (01): : 7 - 18
  • [30] Leaf Area Regulates the Growth Rates and Seed Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) in Intercropping System
    Raza, Muhammad Ali
    Gul, Hina
    Hasnain, Ali
    Bin Khalid, Muhammad Hayder
    Hussain, Sajad
    Abbas, Ghulam
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Babar, Muhammad Jawad
    Ahmed, Zaheer
    Saeed, Amjad
    Riaz, Muhammad Umair
    Khan, Azeem Iqbal
    Kakar, Khair Muhammad
    Ercisli, Sezai
    El Sabah, Ayman
    Qin, Ruijun
    Ahmad, Shakeel
    Feng, Yang
    Yang, Wenyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2022, 16 (04) : 639 - 652