Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Schnittka, Emma [1 ]
Lanpher, Nick W. [1 ]
Cushing-murray, Jessica [1 ]
Decker, Trevor [1 ]
Patel, Praful G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Med, Dothan, AL 36303 USA
[2] Southeast Hlth Med Ctr, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
[3] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
关键词
robotic assited surgery; systematic review and meta analysis; single-incision surgery; minimally invasive gynecologic surgery; endometrial cancers; robotic hysterectomy; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.34702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen???s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen???s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen???s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Xiang Yang
    Ji, Wu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [42] Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study
    Sun, Hao
    Gao, Jinghai
    Jin, Zhijin
    Wu, Yuxian
    Zhou, Yang
    Liu, Xiaojun
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2021, 16 (03) : 597 - 603
  • [43] Outcomes following surgical resection of trigeminal schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Constantine L. Karras
    Pavlos Texakalidis
    Vineeth M. Thirunavu
    Khizar R. Nandoliya
    Rushmin Khazanchi
    Kayla Byrne
    James P. Chandler
    Stephen T. Magill
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [44] Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Montalti, Roberto
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Patriti, Alberto
    Vivarelli, Marco
    Troisi, Roberto Ivan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (27) : 8441 - 8451
  • [45] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Jianglei
    Li, Xiaoyao
    Zhao, Shifu
    Zhang, Ruifu
    Yang, Dejun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [46] Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Guo, Xinmeng
    Tian, Shuang
    Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Jinning
    Cheng, Yanfei
    Yao, Yuanqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [47] Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Following Surgical Treatment for Refractory Epilepsy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Shi-Yong
    Yang, Xiao-Lin
    Chen, Bing
    Hou, Zhi
    An, Ning
    Yang, Mei-Hua
    Yang, Hui
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (06) : e500
  • [48] Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Pengyu
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Chen, Lixin
    Liu, Tiantong
    Dai, Menghua
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (01) : 7 - 21
  • [49] Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid-compartment prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Qi
    Manodoro, Stefano
    Jiang, Xiaoxiang
    Lin, Chaoqin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2025, : 792 - 803
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy
    Wong, Daniel J.
    Wong, Michelle J.
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Wu, Yao Ming
    Lai, Paul B.
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (03) : 165 - 170