Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Schnittka, Emma [1 ]
Lanpher, Nick W. [1 ]
Cushing-murray, Jessica [1 ]
Decker, Trevor [1 ]
Patel, Praful G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Med, Dothan, AL 36303 USA
[2] Southeast Hlth Med Ctr, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
[3] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
关键词
robotic assited surgery; systematic review and meta analysis; single-incision surgery; minimally invasive gynecologic surgery; endometrial cancers; robotic hysterectomy; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.34702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen???s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen???s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen???s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Migraines: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
    Evans, Adam G.
    Hill, Dorian S.
    Grush, Andrew E.
    Downer, Mauricio A., Jr.
    Ibrahim, Maryo M.
    Assi, Patrick E.
    Joseph, Jeremy T.
    Kassis, Salam H.
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 31 (02) : 192 - 205
  • [32] Coaxial-Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Surgical Outcomes Compared with Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy by Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Choi, Su Hyeon
    Won, Seyeon
    Lee, Nara
    Shim, So Hyun
    Kim, Mi Kyoung
    Kim, Mi-La
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Yun, Bo Seong
    Seong, Seok Ju
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [33] Surgical outcomes of different approaches in robotic assisted thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Xing, Zhichao
    Qiu, Yuxuan
    Abuduwaili, Munire
    Xia, Baoying
    Fei, Yuan
    Zhu, Jingqiang
    Su, Anping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 89
  • [34] Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic splenectomy
    Wu, Shike
    Lai, Hao
    Zhao, Jiangyang
    Deng, Xin
    Wei, Jianbao
    Liang, Jian
    Mo, Xianwei
    Chen, Jiansi
    Lin, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [35] Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Yang, Lilin
    Gao, Jie
    Zeng, Lei
    Weng, Zhiwei
    Luo, Songping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [36] Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: A double-institution case-control study
    Fagotti, A.
    Corrado, G.
    Fanfani, F.
    Mancini, M.
    Paglia, A.
    Vizzielli, G.
    Sindico, S.
    Scambia, G.
    Vizza, E.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 130 (01) : 219 - 223
  • [37] Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis
    Koehler, Franziska
    Reese, Lena
    Kastner, Carolin
    Hendricks, Anne
    Mueller, Sophie
    Lock, Johan F.
    Germer, Christoph-Thomas
    Wiegering, Armin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [38] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Bundred, James
    Saint Marc, Olivier
    Jiao, Long R.
    Manas, Derek
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    White, Steven A.
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (01): : 6 - 14
  • [39] Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Giannis, Dimitrios
    Esagian, Stepan M.
    Economopoulos, Konstantinos P.
    Tohme, Samer
    Geller, David A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (02): : 524 - 535
  • [40] Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Nonrobotic Approaches: A Meta-Analysis Examining Surgical Outcomes
    Kandil, Emad
    Hammad, AbdulRahman Y.
    Walvekar, Rohan R.
    Hu, Tian
    Masoodi, Hammad
    Mohamed, Salah Eldin
    Deniwar, Ahmed
    Stack, Brendan C., Jr.
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2016, 23 (03) : 317 - 325