Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Schnittka, Emma [1 ]
Lanpher, Nick W. [1 ]
Cushing-murray, Jessica [1 ]
Decker, Trevor [1 ]
Patel, Praful G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Med, Dothan, AL 36303 USA
[2] Southeast Hlth Med Ctr, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
[3] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
关键词
robotic assited surgery; systematic review and meta analysis; single-incision surgery; minimally invasive gynecologic surgery; endometrial cancers; robotic hysterectomy; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.34702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen???s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen???s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen???s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upper Urinary Tract Surgery Through Robotic Single-Port System Vs Multiport and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shi, Xu
    Feng, Dechao
    Han, Ping
    Wei, Wuran
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (05) : 542 - 550
  • [22] Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Riemma, Gaetano
    Pasanisi, Francesca
    Reino, Antonella
    Solazzo, Maria Cristina
    Ronsini, Carlo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (02):
  • [23] Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raffone, Antonio
    Travaglino, Antonio
    Raimondo, Diego
    Boccia, Dominga
    Vetrella, Martino
    Verrazzo, Paolo
    Granata, Marcello
    Casadio, Paolo
    Insabato, Luigi
    Mollo, Antonio
    Seracchioli, Renato
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jia, Jianghua
    Yang, Zhan
    Teng, Zhihai
    Han, Zhenwei
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 20 - 34
  • [25] Outcomes following surgical resection of trigeminal schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karras, Constantine L.
    Texakalidis, Pavlos
    Thirunavu, Vineeth M.
    Nandoliya, Khizar R.
    Khazanchi, Rushmin
    Byrne, Kayla
    Chandler, James P.
    Magill, Stephen T.
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [26] Single-site robotic-assisted hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping for low-risk endometrial cancer: surgical technique and preliminary outcomes
    Chan, Felix
    Johansson, Cherynne Yuin Mun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (05) : 966 - 972
  • [27] Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy
    Markar, S. R.
    Karthikesalingam, A.
    Di Franco, F.
    Harris, A. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (13) : 1709 - 1718
  • [28] Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
    Noh, Joseph J.
    Jeon, Jung-Eun
    Jung, Ji-Hee
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [29] Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Inpatient Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ellinides, Andreas
    Manolopoulos, Philip P.
    Hajymiri, Melika
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Trompoukis, Pantelis
    Ntourakis, Dimitrios
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 23 - +
  • [30] Robotic versus Open Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jie
    Wu, Wen-Ming
    You, Lei
    Zhao, Yu-Pei
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : 1774 - 1780