Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Schnittka, Emma [1 ]
Lanpher, Nick W. [1 ]
Cushing-murray, Jessica [1 ]
Decker, Trevor [1 ]
Patel, Praful G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Med, Dothan, AL 36303 USA
[2] Southeast Hlth Med Ctr, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
[3] Alabama Coll Ostepath Med, Obstet & Gynecol, Dothan, AL USA
关键词
robotic assited surgery; systematic review and meta analysis; single-incision surgery; minimally invasive gynecologic surgery; endometrial cancers; robotic hysterectomy; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.34702
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen???s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen???s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen???s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Weimin
    Wang, Zhangyi
    Liu, Xiaohang
    Tan, Songhong
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [2] Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Spartalis, Eleftherios
    Tsourouflis, Gerasimos
    Dimitroulis, Dimitrios
    Nikiteas, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (05) : 679 - 686
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anastasia Prodromidou
    Eleftherios Spartalis
    Gerasimos Tsourouflis
    Dimitrios Dimitroulis
    Nikolaos Nikiteas
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 679 - 686
  • [4] Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site
    Gardella, Barbara
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Gritti, Andrea
    Musacchi, Valentina
    Stracquadaini, Michele
    Bogliolo, Stefano
    Scudeller, Luigia
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 31 (06) : 954 - 961
  • [5] Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis
    Moukarzel, Lea A.
    Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
    Fader, Amanda N.
    Tanner, Edward J.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (06) : 977 - 983
  • [6] Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis
    Bogliolo, Stefano
    Ferrero, Simone
    Cassani, Chiara
    Musacchi, Valentina
    Zanellini, Francesca
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Gardella, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 603 - 609
  • [7] Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study
    Corrado, Giacomo
    Cutillo, Giuseppe
    Mancini, Emanuela
    Baiocco, Ermelinda
    Patrizi, Lodovico
    Saltari, Maria
    Sidozzi, Anna di Luca
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Pomati, Giulia
    Vizza, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04)
  • [8] Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes
    Gardella, Barbara
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Gritti, Andrea
    Mereu, Liliana
    Bogliolo, Stefano
    Torella, Marco
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Malzoni, Mario
    Couso, Aldina
    Zapico, Alvaro
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (01):
  • [9] Single-Site Robotic Total Hysterectomy: Standardization of Technique and Surgical Outcomes
    Sendag, Fatih
    Akdemir, Ali
    Zeybek, Burak
    Ozdemir, Asuman
    Gunusen, Ilkben
    Oztekin, Mehmet Kemal
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 689 - 694
  • [10] Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Ning
    Zhang, Jialin
    Zhang, Chengshuo
    Shi, Yue
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (06): : 1205 - 1211