Monitoring of functionally graded material during laser directed energy deposition by acoustic emission and optical emission spectroscopy using artificial intelligence

被引:17
作者
Wasmer, Kilian [1 ]
Wust, Matthias [1 ]
Cui, Di [1 ]
Masinelli, Giulio [1 ]
Pandiyan, Vigneashwara [1 ]
Shevchik, Sergey [1 ]
机构
[1] Empa, Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Lab Adv Mat Proc, Thun, Switzerland
关键词
Functionally graded material; laser directed energy deposition; acoustic emission; optical emission spectroscopy; artificial intelligence; MECHANISMS; REGRESSION; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1080/17452759.2023.2189599
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser directed energy deposition (L-DED) allows the production of multi-materials and functionally graded material (FGM) parts. But for commercialisation, process and quality monitoring of parts is required. For the first time, a novel monitoring method for chemical composition and process regimes of FGMs is proposed using a cost-effective acoustic emission (AE) (microphone) and optical emission spectroscopy (OES) sensors. Four chemical compositions (100%Ti, 58%Ti42%Nb, 37%Ti63%Nb, and 100% Nb) and two process parameters (475 W - 1'400 mm/min and 175 W - 2'000 mm/min) were selected, leading to four regimes/quality (conduction mode, partial, minor, medium, and severe lack of fusion pores). The signals were classified using seven mainstream artificial intelligence algorithms. The main conclusions are twofold. First, microphones are unsuitable candidates for monitoring the laser-material interaction during L-DED. The acoustic waves generated by the laser-material interaction are shielded by high gas flow surrounding it and so are either highly disturbed or does not reach the microphone. Conversely, OES are suitable candidates as the classification accuracies are higher than 90% for most category and machine learning algorithms, even after drastic feature reduction. Considering the wide range of chemical composition and quality, our proposed methods using OES have high industrialised potentials for them during L-DED FGM.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Azencott C.-A., 2022, Introduction au Machine Learning
[2]   Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Amit ;
Heer, Bryan .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 2018, 129 :1-16
[3]  
Barro O., 2021, Addit. Manuf., P121, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-818411-0.00003-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818411-0.00003-3]
[4]  
Bauerle DW, 2013, Laser Processing and Chemistry
[5]   Identification and qualification of temperature signal for monitoring and control in laser cladding [J].
Bi, Guijun ;
Gasser, Andres ;
Wissenbach, Konrad ;
Drenker, Alexander ;
Poprawe, Reinhart .
OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2006, 44 (12) :1348-1359
[6]   Investigation on the direct laser metallic powder deposition process via temperature measurement [J].
Bi, Guijun ;
Gasser, Andres ;
Wissenbach, Konrad ;
Drenker, Alexander ;
Poprawe, Reinhart .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2006, 253 (03) :1411-1416
[7]   Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review [J].
Blakey-Milner, Byron ;
Gradl, Paul ;
Snedden, Glen ;
Brooks, Michael ;
Pitot, Jean ;
Lopez, Elena ;
Leary, Martin ;
Berto, Filippo ;
du Plessis, Anton .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2021, 209
[8]   Prediction of lack of fusion porosity in selective laser melting based on melt pool monitoring data [J].
Coeck, Sam ;
Bisht, Manisha ;
Plas, Jan ;
Verbist, Frederik .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 25 :347-356
[9]  
Cui D, 2020, Industrializing Additive Manufacturing, P96, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-54334-1_8
[10]   Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Culmone, Costanza ;
Smit, Gerwin ;
Breedveld, Paul .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 27 :461-473