Electricity industry (de)regulation and innovation in negative-emission technologies: How do market liberalization influences climate change mitigation?

被引:4
作者
Agyeman, Stephen Duah [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Boqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Policy, Sch Management, Fujian 361005, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Belt & Rd Res Inst, Fujian 361005, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
OECD; Product market regulation (PMR); Innovation; Staggered difference-in-differences; Feed-in tariffs; Carbon capture and storage (CCS); RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CARBON CAPTURE; COMPETITION; IMPACTS; DEREGULATION; POWER; UTILITIES; POLICIES; GROWTH; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.126863
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Deregulation is widely considered a driver of competition and reduction of market inefficiency and can lead to innovation. We deepen the literature and policy understanding of this narrative by extending it to negative emission technologies while we strengthen the findings of previous studies by accounting for input research and development (R&D) expenditure with heterogeneity analyses. The authors adopt the staggered difference -in-difference (SDID) design to 25 OECD countries for the period 1985-2015 to examine the influence of deregu-lation on innovation in the electricity industry with an emphasis on negative emission technologies. The empirical results show that while electricity deregulation is generally associated with increased innovation, only intense market deregulation can promote innovation in carbon capture and storage (CCS). This benefit is more observed in European Union OECD countries and those with high output innovation performance. The results also show that when implemented after market deregulation, solar PV and Wind power Feed-in tariffs effectively promote renewable energy innovation. The results suggest that electricity deregulation is a compelling market tool to promote climate change mitigation since the competitive market it creates supports the advancement of CCS and renewable energy innovation. We recommend a deregulation process to accommodate an effective market model designed to incentivize the promotion of funding for negative emission technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Adolf B., 1932, MODERN CORPORATION P
[2]   Electricity deregulation in OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries [J].
Al-Sunaidy, A ;
Green, R .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (6-7) :769-787
[3]   THE DYNAMICS OF INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS [J].
AMENDOLA, G ;
DOSI, G ;
PAPAGNI, E .
WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1993, 129 (03) :451-471
[4]   R&D and the patent premium [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Ceccagnoli, Marco ;
Cohen, Wesley M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2008, 26 (05) :1153-1179
[5]  
Athey S., 1998, EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK
[6]  
Athey S, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V24
[7]  
AVERCH H, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1052
[8]   How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? * [J].
Baker, Andrew C. ;
Larcker, David F. ;
Wang, Charles C. Y. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (02) :370-395
[9]   Environmental, economic, and social impacts of feed-in tariffs: A Portuguese perspective 2000-2010 [J].
Behrens, Paul ;
Rodrigues, Joao F. D. ;
Bras, Tiago ;
Silva, Carlos .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 173 :309-319
[10]   Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden [J].
Bellamy, Rob ;
Fridahl, Mathias ;
Lezaun, Javier ;
Palmer, James ;
Rodriguez, Emily ;
Lefvert, Adrian ;
Hansson, Anders ;
Gronkvist, Stefan ;
Haikola, Simon .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 :47-55