An overview and critical assessment of thermochemical hydrogen production methods

被引:43
作者
Karaca, Ali Erdogan [1 ]
Qureshy, Ali M. M. I. [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Tech Univ, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Clean Energy Res Lab CERL, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
关键词
Cleaner production; Hydrogen production; Environmental impact; Global warming; Energy; Efficiency; Cost; Sustainability; IODINE-SULFUR PROCESS; ELECTROCHEMICAL BUNSEN REACTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CU-CL CYCLE; THERMAL-DISSOCIATION; WATER; REACTOR; HEAT; ZNO; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135706
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the present study, the most common thermochemical cycles in the literature for hydrogen production are reviewed and discussed comparatively. These thermochemical cycles are first classified in accordance with the number of cycle steps. Then, the main thermochemical cycles that fall under the corresponding categories are further described and evaluated. The thermochemical cycles that can be potentially energized primarily via thermal energy from nuclear plants are highlighted. The main seven methods are comparatively evaluated through efficiencies, production cost, global warming potential, and acidification potential. Although there are previous studies showing interest in a similar field, this peer review intends to provide useful content for the researchers working in the field. The results of this study show a promising direction for using four of these cycles, namely Cu-Cl, V-Cl, Mg-Cl and S-I cycles, due to their high performance values in terms of energy effi-ciency as 52.6%, 69%, 63.63% and 46.9%, and in terms of exergy efficiency as 78.21%, 77.28%, 71%, 62.39%, respectively. Furthermore, these thermochemical cycles appear to be suitable for clean hydrogen production with a cost as low as 1.71 $/kg H2.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 :835-849
[2]   Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) :1-12
[3]   A process simulation study of hydrogen and sulfur production from hydrogen sulfide using the Fe-Cl hybrid process [J].
Adewale, Rasheed A. ;
Berrouk, Abdallah S. ;
Dara, Satyadileep .
JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2015, 54 :20-27
[4]   Solar water splitting for hydrogen production with monolithic reactors [J].
Agrafiotis, C ;
Roeb, M ;
Konstandopoulos, AG ;
Nalbandian, L ;
Zaspalis, VT ;
Sattler, C ;
Stobbe, P ;
Steele, AM .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2005, 79 (04) :409-421
[5]   Hydrogen production in solar reactors [J].
Agrafiotis, Christos C. ;
Pagkoura, Chrysoula ;
Lorentzou, Souzana ;
Kostoglott, Margaritis ;
Konstandopoulos, Athanasios G. .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2007, 127 (1-4) :265-277
[6]   Thermaly integrated five-step ZnSI thermochemical cycle hydrogen production process using solar energy [J].
Ahangar, Niloofar ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 222
[7]   Assessment and analysis of hydrogen and electricity production from a Generation IV lead-cooled nuclear reactor integrated with a copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle [J].
Al-Zareer, Maan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (01) :91-103
[8]  
Amendola S, 2010, Patent No. [US7799315B2, 7799315]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Understanding Global Warming Potentials
[10]  
Anzieu P., 2006, International Journal of Nuclear Hydrogen Production and Applications, V1, P144, DOI 10.1504/IJNHPA.2006.011248