Radiomics-based machine learning models for prediction of medulloblastoma subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test performance

被引:14
作者
Karabacak, Mert [1 ]
Ozkara, Burak Berksu [1 ]
Ozturk, Admir [1 ]
Kaya, Busra [2 ]
Cirak, Zeynep [1 ]
Orak, Ece [1 ]
Ozcan, Zeynep [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Fac Med, TR-34098 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Altinbas Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Medulloblastoma; radiomics; machine learning; deep learning; artificial intelligence; MOLECULAR SUBGROUPS; TEST ACCURACY; MRI FEATURES; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; IMPACT; IMAGES; GLIOMA; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1177/02841851221143496
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Medulloblastomas are a major cause of cancer-related mortality in the pediatric population. Four molecular groups have been identified, and these molecular groups drive risk stratification, prognostic modeling, and the development of novel treatment modalities. It has been demonstrated that radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models are effective at predicting the diagnosis, molecular class, and grades of CNS tumors. Purpose To assess radiomics-based ML models' diagnostic performance in predicting medulloblastoma subgroups and the methodological quality of the studies. Material and Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed; the last search was conducted on 1 May 2022. Studies that predicted all four medulloblastoma subgroups in patients with histopathologically confirmed medulloblastoma and reporting area under the curve (AUC) values were included in the study. The quality assessments were conducted according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). A meta-analysis of radiomics-based ML studies' diagnostic performance for the preoperative evaluation of medulloblastoma subgrouping was performed. Results Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. Regarding patient selection, two studies indicated an unclear risk of bias according to the QUADAS-2. The five studies had an average CLAIM score and compliance score of 23.2 and 0.57, respectively. The meta-analysis showed pooled AUCs of 0.88, 0.82, 0.83, and 0.88 for WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4 for classification, respectively. Conclusion Radiomics-based ML studies have good classification performance in predicting medulloblastoma subgroups, with AUCs >0.80 in every subgroup. To be applied to clinical practice, they need methodological quality improvement and stability.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2003
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   A survey on data-efficient algorithms in big data era [J].
Adadi, Amina .
JOURNAL OF BIG DATA, 2021, 8 (01)
[2]   Medulloblastoma: Molecular Classification-Based Personal Therapeutics [J].
Archer, Tenley C. ;
Mahoney, Elizabeth L. ;
Pomeroy, Scott L. .
NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2017, 14 (02) :265-273
[3]   From One to Many: Further Refinement of Medulloblastoma Subtypes Offers Promise for Personalized Therapy [J].
Bavle, Abhishek ;
Parsons, D. Williams .
CANCER CELL, 2017, 31 (06) :727-729
[4]   A Spotlight on the Role of Radiomics and Machine-Learning Applications in the Management of Intracranial Meningiomas: A New Perspective in Neuro-Oncology: A Review [J].
Brunasso, Lara ;
Ferini, Gianluca ;
Bonosi, Lapo ;
Costanzo, Roberta ;
Musso, Sofia ;
Benigno, Umberto E. ;
Gerardi, Rosa M. ;
Giammalva, Giuseppe R. ;
Paolini, Federica ;
Umana, Giuseppe E. ;
Graziano, Francesca ;
Scalia, Gianluca ;
Sturiale, Carmelo L. ;
Di Bonaventura, Rina ;
Iacopino, Domenico G. ;
Maugeri, Rosario .
LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04)
[5]   Magnetic resonance radiomics features and prognosticators in different molecular subtypes of pediatric Medulloblastoma [J].
Chang, Feng-Chi ;
Wong, Tai-Tong ;
Wu, Kuo-Sheng ;
Lu, Chia-Feng ;
Weng, Ting-Wei ;
Liang, Muh-Lii ;
Wu, Chih-Chun ;
Guo, Wan Yuo ;
Chen, Cheng-Yu ;
Hsieh, Kevin Li-Chun .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07)
[6]   Molecular subgrouping of medulloblastoma based on few-shot learning of multitasking using conventional MR images: a retrospective multicenter study [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Fan, Zhen ;
Li, Kay Ka-Wai ;
Wu, Guoqing ;
Yang, Zhong ;
Gao, Xin ;
Liu, Yingchao ;
Wu, Haibo ;
Chen, Hong ;
Tang, Qisheng ;
Chen, Liang ;
Wang, Yuanyuan ;
Mao, Ying ;
Ng, Ho-Keung ;
Shi, Zhifeng ;
Yu, Jinhua ;
Zhou, Liangfu .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2020, 2 (01)
[7]   How to Perform a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Studies [J].
Cronin, Paul ;
Kelly, Aine Marie ;
Altaee, Duaa ;
Foerster, Bradley ;
Petrou, Myria ;
Dwamena, Ben A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) :573-593
[8]   Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a meta-analysis [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Cipullo, Maria Brunella ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Romeo, Valeria ;
Green, Roberta ;
Cantoni, Valeria ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Ugga, Lorenzo ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (12) :6877-6887
[9]  
Curtin Sally C, 2016, NCHS Data Brief, P1
[10]  
Darzidehkalani Erfan, 2022, J Am Coll Radiol, V19, P969, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.03.015