Comparative review of hydrogen and electricity as energy carriers for the energy transition

被引:47
作者
Aba, Michael M. [1 ]
Sauer, Ildo Luis [1 ]
Amado, Nilton Bispo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Energy Program Inst Energy & Environm, Energy Program, Ave Prof Luciano Gualberto,1-289, BR-05508010 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Hydrogen; Electricity; Energy production; Energy transport; Energy storage; Energy transition; STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES; PRODUCTION OPTIONS; EXERGY ANALYSIS; ROAD TRANSPORT; CARBON CAPTURE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POWER-PLANT; NATURAL-GAS; SOLAR POWER; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.034
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Researchers and policymakers are seeking alternatives to oil products. Hydrogen and electricity could be the answer. This review compares both carriers and their technologies across the production chain. This study indicates electricity is more mature and advanced on a large scale. It also presents greater Energy Returns on Investment (EROI) over hydrogen, which portends a viable alternative to oil products. Hydrogen is not adaptable to traditional uses and comes with significant transportation losses, so it's recommended as an energy storage option instead of a carrier. It is a competitive option in areas where grid extension is not feasible and is hard to abate industries. The primary resource of carriers is crucial for their energy and environmental sustainability. Therefore, clean energy and carbon capture and storage technologies and their hybridization across the production chain could define the future energy landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 678
页数:19
相关论文
共 187 条
[1]   Exergy analysis of large and impounded hydropower plants: Case study El Roseires Dam (280MW) [J].
Abuelnuor, Abuelnuor A. A. ;
Ahmed, Khadir ;
Saqr, Khaled M. ;
Nogoud, Yasser A. M. ;
Babiker, Mohammed E. A. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 39 (03)
[2]   Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 :835-849
[3]   Energy and exergy analysis of solar energy-integrated, geothermal energy-powered Organic Rankine Cycle [J].
Acar, Merve Senturk ;
Arslan, Oguz .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2019, 137 (02) :659-666
[4]   The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen [J].
Ajanovic, A. ;
Sayer, M. ;
Haas, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (57) :24136-24154
[5]   Prospects and impediments for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles in the transport sector [J].
Ajanovic, A. ;
Haas, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (16) :10049-10058
[6]   Economic and Environmental Prospects for Battery Electric- and Fuel Cell Vehicles: A Review [J].
Ajanovic, A. ;
Haas, R. .
FUEL CELLS, 2019, 19 (05) :515-529
[7]  
Akinte OO, 2021, HVAC VS HVDC power system: contemporary development in HVAC and HVDC power transmission system digital signal processing view project electrical engineering view project HVAC VS HVDC power system: contemporary development in HVAC and HVDC power transmissi
[8]   Development and assessment of a novel integrated nuclear plant for electricity and hydrogen production [J].
Al-Zareer, Maan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 134 :221-234
[9]   Green hydrogen & electricity production via geothermal-driven multi-generation system: Thermodynamic modeling and optimization [J].
Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba ;
Assareh, Ehsanolah ;
Pourghassab, Nader Nadaki ;
Delpisheh, Mostafa ;
Barelli, Linda ;
Baldinelli, Arianna .
FUEL, 2022, 308
[10]   A brief systematic review of the literature on the economic, social and environmental impacts of shale gas exploitation in the United Kingdom [J].
Alvarez-Ramos, Carolina ;
Diez-Suarez, Ana-Maria ;
de Simon-Martin, Miguel ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, Alberto ;
Rosales-Asensio, Enrique .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 :11-17