Pro-Environmental Nationalism is Still Nationalism: How Political Identity and Prior Attitudes Affect Nationalist Framing Effects on Support for Climate Action

被引:8
作者
Bogado, Natalia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kaiserslautern Landau, Commun & Media Psychol Inst, Fac Psychol, Landau In Der Pfalz, Germany
[2] Univ Kaiserslautern Landau, Commun & Media Psychol Inst, Fac Psychol, Fortstr 7, D-76829 Landau In Der Pfalz, Germany
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2024年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
Biased cognition; climate change; framing effects; nationalism; motivated reasoning; COOL DUDES; SKEPTICISM; DISCOURSE; IDEOLOGY; SECURITY; BELIEFS; MATTERS; POLICY; WHITE; US;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2024.2310625
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Based on research on framing effects and biased cognition, this paper investigated the limitations of framing pro-environmental messages in nationalist terms that emphasize the importance of upholding national pride, security, and leadership in global climate mitigation - a growing tendency among pro-environmental governments. Evidence from two survey experiments in the United States (N = 1075 and N = 205, respectively) supported the hypothesis that political identities and prior attitudes drove the effects of pro-environmental nationalist frame exposure on climate attitudes by influencing which considerations remained salient in people's minds following exposure. Study 1 showed that Republicans (versus Democrats) and nationalist participants assigned more salience to nationalist considerations following exposure, resulting in higher ethnoculturalism and, subsequently, lower climate mitigation support and higher climate scepticism. Study 2 largely replicated these results. Thus, this paper highlighted the limitations of framing pro-environmental information in nationalist terms to increase support for climate action.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 694
页数:20
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
[2]   Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Gendered Nationalism: Masculinity, Climate Denial and Covid-19 [J].
Agius, Christine ;
Rosamond, Annika Bergman ;
Kinnvall, Catarina .
POLITICS RELIGION & IDEOLOGY, 2020, 21 (04) :432-450
[3]  
Allport GW., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[4]   Love for the globe but also the country matter for the environment: Links between nationalistic, patriotic, global identification and pro-environmentalism [J].
Aydin, Erdal ;
Bagci, Sabahat Cigdem ;
Kelesoglu, Iklim .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 80
[6]  
Banisch S., 2021, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895117, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3895117]
[7]   A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond [J].
Bayes, Robin ;
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2023, 17 (01) :16-34
[8]   Assessing the relative importance of psychological and demographic factors for predicting climate and environmental attitudes [J].
Beiser-McGrath, Liam F. ;
Huber, Robert A. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2018, 149 (3-4) :335-347
[9]   Racial Disparities in Climate Change-Related Health Effects in the United States [J].
Berberian, Alique G. ;
Gonzalez, David J. X. ;
Cushing, Lara J. .
CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 9 (03) :451-464
[10]   Stand out of my sunlight: The mediating role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in the relationship between national collective narcissism and acceptance of climate science [J].
Bertin, Paul ;
Nera, Kenzo ;
Hamer, Katarzyna ;
Uhl-Haedicke, Isabella ;
Delouvee, Sylvain .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2021, 24 (05) :738-758