Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast for Breast Reconstruction: A Short-Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure

被引:0
作者
Park, Benjamin C. [1 ]
Drolet, Brian C. [2 ,3 ]
Perdikis, Galen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Biomed Eth & Soc, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, 1161 21st Ave South,Suite D-4207, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MASTECTOMY; VALIDITY; CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010620
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Breast reconstruction procedures are among the most commonly performed plastic surgery operations. Although there are well-validated patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for breast reconstruction, there are several patient-, provider-, and service-level barriers to their implementation in routine clinical settings. Therefore, we developed a short-form PROM to evaluate breast reconstruction outcomes. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, the Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast (VMP-B) was constructed and validated to assess patient-reported outcomes from breast reconstruction. Classic test theory methods were used to evaluate acceptability, reliability, and validity. External validation was subsequently performed using the BREAST-Q as a reference standard. Results: The VMP-B is a 16-item instrument composed of three domains: quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. Psychometric properties including acceptability, reliability, and validity exceeded reference criteria. When tested with 104 patients, the authors found significant benefits of breast reconstruction on quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. These results were associated with sizeable effect sizes (g) (g = 0.421, g = 0.520, and g = 1.25) demonstrative of clinically meaningful results. When tested concurrently in 70 patients, the VMP-B and the BREAST-Q showed similar results, exhibiting excellent convergent validity. Conclusions: The VMP-B is a validated short-form PROM that reliably assesses breast reconstruction outcomes. As a short form, the VMP-B decreases both patient and provider burden, which allows for routine, point-of-care collection of breast reconstruction outcomes. Copyright (C) 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:291e / 302e
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes [J].
Abma I.L. ;
Rovers M. ;
Van Der Wees P.J. .
BMC Research Notes, 9 (1)
[2]   The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials [J].
Anker, Stefan D. ;
Agewall, Stefan ;
Borggrefe, Martin ;
Calvert, Melanie ;
Caro, J. Jaime ;
Cowie, Martin R. ;
Ford, Ian ;
Paty, Jean A. ;
Riley, Jillian P. ;
Swedberg, Karl ;
Tavazzi, Luigi ;
Wiklund, Ingela ;
Kirchhof, Paulus .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (30) :2001-+
[3]  
Becker B., 2021, J PATIENT-REP OUTCOM, V5, P1
[4]   Patient-Reported Outcomes and Aesthetic Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study [J].
Blohmer, Jens-Uwe ;
Beier, Lea ;
Faridi, Andree ;
Ankel, Christine ;
Krause-Bergmann, Barbara ;
Paepke, Stefan ;
Mau, Christine ;
Keller, Maren ;
Strittmatter, Hans Joachim ;
Karsten, Maria Margarete .
BREAST CARE, 2021, 16 (04) :335-342
[5]   Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer [J].
Boateng, Godfred O. ;
Neilands, Torsten B. ;
Frongillo, Edward A. ;
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. ;
Young, Sera L. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
[6]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[7]   Interpretive description: A flexible qualitative methodology for medical education research [J].
Burdine, Julie Thompson ;
Thorne, Sally ;
Sandhu, Gurjit .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (03) :336-343
[8]   Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Comment [J].
Cappelleri, Joseph C. ;
Lundy, J. Jason ;
Hays, Ron D. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (05) :648-662
[9]   Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results [J].
Carlson, Kevin D. ;
Herdman, Andrew O. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (01) :17-32
[10]   Clinimetric Criteria for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures [J].
Carrozzino, Danilo ;
Patierno, Chiara ;
Guidi, Jenny ;
Berrocal Montiel, Carmen ;
Cao, Jianxin ;
Charlson, Mary E. ;
Christensen, Kaj Sparle ;
Concato, John ;
De las Cuevas, Carlos ;
De Leon, Jose ;
Eory, Ajandek ;
Fleck, Marcelo Pio ;
Furukawa, Toshi A. ;
Horwitz, Ralph I. ;
Nierenberg, Andrew A. ;
Rafanelli, Chiara ;
Wang, Hongxing ;
Wise, Thomas N. ;
Sonino, Nicoletta ;
Fava, Giovanni A. .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2021, :222-232