Implementation of Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Prevention With a Polygenic Risk Score Test in Clinical Practice

被引:1
|
作者
Padrik, Peeter [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Puustusmaa, Mikk [1 ]
Tonisson, Neeme [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kolk, Berit [1 ]
Saar, Regina [1 ]
Padrik, Anna [1 ]
Tasa, Tonis [1 ]
机构
[1] OU Antegenes, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu Univ Hosp, Clin Hematol & Oncol, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Inst Genom, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Tartu Univ Hosp, Genet & Personalized Med Clin, Tartu, Estonia
[5] OU Antegenes, Raatuse 21, EE-50603 Tartu, Estonia
来源
BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
breast cancer; polygenic risk score; screening; personalized prevention; genetic predisposition; BENEFITS; PREDICTION; HARMS;
D O I
10.1177/11782234231205700
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography reduces mortality but considers currently only age as a risk factor. Personalized risk-based screening has been proposed as a more efficient alternative. For that, risk prediction tools are necessary. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) associated with BC. The effects of SNPs are combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS) as a risk prediction tool.Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical-grade PRS test suitable for BC risk-stratified screening with clinical recommendations and implementation in clinical practice.Design and methods: In the first phase of our study, we gathered previously published PRS models for predicting BC risk from the literature and validated them using the Estonian Biobank and UK Biobank data sets. We selected the best performing model based on prevalent data and independently validated it in both incident data sets. We then conducted absolute risk simulations, developed risk-based recommendations, and implemented the PRS test in clinical practice. In the second phase, we carried out a retrospective analysis of the PRS test's performance results in clinical practice.Results: The best performing PRS included 2803 SNPs. The C-index of the Cox regression model associating BC status with PRS was 0.656 (SE = 0.05) with a hazard ratio of 1.66. The PRS can stratify individuals with more than a 3-fold risk increase. A total of 2637 BC PRS tests have been performed for women between the ages 30 and 83. Results in clinical use overlap well with expected PRS performance with 5.7% of women with more than 2-fold and 1.4% with more than 3-fold higher risk than the population average.Conclusion: The PRS test separates different BC risk levels and is feasible to implement in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of a clinical breast cancer risk assessment tool combining a polygenic score for all ancestries with traditional risk factors
    Mabey, Brent
    Hughes, Elisha
    Kucera, Matthew
    Simmons, Timothy
    Hullinger, Brooke
    Pederson, Holly J.
    Yehia, Lamis
    Eng, Charis
    Garber, Judy
    Gary, Monique
    Gordon, Ora
    Klemp, Jennifer R.
    Mukherjee, Semanti
    Vijai, Joseph
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
    Pruthi, Sandhya
    Kurian, Allison
    Robson, Mark E.
    Whitworth, Pat W.
    Pal, Tuya
    Ratzel, Sarah
    Wagner, Susanne
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Taber, Katherine Johansen
    Slavin, Thomas P.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Offi, Kenneth
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (07)
  • [22] Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation and Effects of Variable Imputation
    Beck, Jeffrey J.
    Slunecka, John L.
    Johnson, Brandon N.
    Van Asselt, Austin J.
    Finnicum, Casey T.
    Ageton, Cheryl
    Krie, Amy
    Nickles, Heidi
    Cowan, Kenneth
    Maxwell, Jessica
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    de Geus, Eco
    Ehli, Erik A.
    Hottenga, Jouke-Jan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [23] Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women
    Zirpoli, Gary R.
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    Bertrand, Kimberly A.
    Huo, Dezheng
    Lunetta, Kathryn L.
    Palmer, Julie R.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [24] Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women
    Gary R. Zirpoli
    Ruth M. Pfeiffer
    Kimberly A. Bertrand
    Dezheng Huo
    Kathryn L. Lunetta
    Julie R. Palmer
    Breast Cancer Research, 26
  • [25] Clinical features of prostate cancer by polygenic risk score
    Spears, Christina
    Xu, Menglin
    Shoben, Abigail
    Dason, Shawn
    Toland, Amanda Ewart
    Byrne, Lindsey
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2024, 23 (04) : 499 - 505
  • [26] Polygenic risk scores and breast cancer risk prediction
    Roberts, Eleanor
    Howell, Sacha
    Evans, D. Gareth
    BREAST, 2023, 67 : 71 - 77
  • [27] Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer
    Demarest, Kaitlin
    Shah, Payal D.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 16 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [28] Polygenic Risk Scores in Breast Cancer
    Lida A. Mina
    Banu Arun
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2019, 11 : 117 - 122
  • [29] Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Denmark - a qualitative study
    Kvernrod, Ann-Britt
    Rasmussen, Christina Hilding
    Pedersen, Line Hjollund
    Bojesen, Stig Egil
    Bigaard, Janne
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Estimation of age of onset and progression of breast cancer by absolute risk dependent on polygenic risk score and other risk factors
    Bhatt, Rikesh
    van den Hout, Ardo
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    Shah, Mitul
    Ficorella, Lorenzo
    Steggall, Emily
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Pashayan, Nora
    CANCER, 2024, 130 (09) : 1590 - 1599