Implementation of Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Prevention With a Polygenic Risk Score Test in Clinical Practice

被引:1
|
作者
Padrik, Peeter [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Puustusmaa, Mikk [1 ]
Tonisson, Neeme [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kolk, Berit [1 ]
Saar, Regina [1 ]
Padrik, Anna [1 ]
Tasa, Tonis [1 ]
机构
[1] OU Antegenes, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu Univ Hosp, Clin Hematol & Oncol, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Inst Genom, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Tartu Univ Hosp, Genet & Personalized Med Clin, Tartu, Estonia
[5] OU Antegenes, Raatuse 21, EE-50603 Tartu, Estonia
来源
BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
breast cancer; polygenic risk score; screening; personalized prevention; genetic predisposition; BENEFITS; PREDICTION; HARMS;
D O I
10.1177/11782234231205700
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography reduces mortality but considers currently only age as a risk factor. Personalized risk-based screening has been proposed as a more efficient alternative. For that, risk prediction tools are necessary. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) associated with BC. The effects of SNPs are combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS) as a risk prediction tool.Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical-grade PRS test suitable for BC risk-stratified screening with clinical recommendations and implementation in clinical practice.Design and methods: In the first phase of our study, we gathered previously published PRS models for predicting BC risk from the literature and validated them using the Estonian Biobank and UK Biobank data sets. We selected the best performing model based on prevalent data and independently validated it in both incident data sets. We then conducted absolute risk simulations, developed risk-based recommendations, and implemented the PRS test in clinical practice. In the second phase, we carried out a retrospective analysis of the PRS test's performance results in clinical practice.Results: The best performing PRS included 2803 SNPs. The C-index of the Cox regression model associating BC status with PRS was 0.656 (SE = 0.05) with a hazard ratio of 1.66. The PRS can stratify individuals with more than a 3-fold risk increase. A total of 2637 BC PRS tests have been performed for women between the ages 30 and 83. Results in clinical use overlap well with expected PRS performance with 5.7% of women with more than 2-fold and 1.4% with more than 3-fold higher risk than the population average.Conclusion: The PRS test separates different BC risk levels and is feasible to implement in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners' Knowledge and Attitudes
    Ayoub, Aya
    Lapointe, Julie
    Nabi, Hermann
    Pashayan, Nora
    GENES, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [2] Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
    Pashayan, Nora
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Martin, Richard M.
    Harrington, Patricia
    Benlloch, Sara
    Al Olama, Ali Amin
    Shah, Mitul
    Kote-Jarai, Zsofia
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Eeles, Rosalind
    Pharoah, Paul D.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (10) : 789 - 795
  • [3] The polygenic risk score in the breast cancer treatment
    Anaclerio, Federico
    Pilenzi, Lucrezia
    Minelli, Maria
    Giansante, Roberta
    Cicirelli, Michela
    Scorrano, Vincenzo
    Antonucci, Ivana
    Stuppia, Liborio
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2024, 8 (04) : 328 - 339
  • [4] A polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population
    Hsieh, Yi-Chen
    Tu, Shih-Hsin
    Su, Chien-Tien
    Cho, Er-Chieh
    Wu, Chih-Hsiung
    Hsieh, Mao-Chih
    Lin, Shiyng-Yu
    Liu, Yun-Ru
    Hung, Chin-Sheng
    Chiou, Hung-Yi
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 163 (01) : 131 - 138
  • [5] A polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population
    Yi-Chen Hsieh
    Shih-Hsin Tu
    Chien-Tien Su
    Er-Chieh Cho
    Chih-Hsiung Wu
    Mao-Chih Hsieh
    Shiyng-Yu Lin
    Yun-Ru Liu
    Chin-Sheng Hung
    Hung-Yi Chiou
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 163 : 131 - 138
  • [6] Toward more personalized breast cancer risk assessment: The polygenic risk score
    Sarkis-Tannous, Daad
    Sukol, Roxanne B.
    Sullivan, Erika
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2023, 36 (10): : 37 - 40
  • [7] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Hu, Donglei
    Ma, Lin
    Huntsman, Scott
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Ziv, Elad
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) : 513 - 525
  • [8] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Yiwey Shieh
    Donglei Hu
    Lin Ma
    Scott Huntsman
    Charlotte C. Gard
    Jessica W. T. Leung
    Jeffrey A. Tice
    Celine M. Vachon
    Steven R. Cummings
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Elad Ziv
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 159 : 513 - 525
  • [9] Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany?
    Arnold, Matthias
    Pfeifer, Katharina
    Quante, Anne S.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [10] Genetic Testing to Guide Risk-Stratified Screens for Breast Cancer
    Willoughby, Ava
    Andreassen, Paul R.
    Toland, Amanda Ewart
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2019, 9 (01):