Changes in Nursing Home Use Following Medicaid-Supported Expanded Access to Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults With Dementia

被引:2
作者
Harrison, Jordan M. [1 ]
Sheng, Flora [2 ]
Josberger, Raina E. [3 ]
Liu, Harry H. [4 ]
Stone, Patricia W. [5 ]
Luchsinger, Jose A. [6 ,7 ]
Dick, Andrew W. [8 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] RAND Corp, Arlington, VA USA
[3] New York State Dept Hlth, Albany, NY USA
[4] Analyt Now LLC, Brookline, MA USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[8] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CARE; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22520
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE New York State's Medicaid managed long-term care (MLTC) program expanded access to home- and community-based services, providing an alternative to nursing home care for people with dementia. Between 2012 and 2015, the state implemented mandatory MLTC for dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollees requiring more than 120 days of community-based long-term care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in nursing home use among older adults with dementia following MLTC implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used longitudinal data from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare administrative data. The study sample included New York State Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older with dementia. New York City residents were excluded due to insufficient pre-study period data. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. EXPOSURE Mandatory MLTC enrollment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Longitudinal models were used to evaluate changes in annual days of nursing home use following the staggered implementation of MLTC across 13 regions of the state. Two models were estimated: (1) a logistic regression model for any nursing home use in a given year and (2) a linear regression model of total nursing home days, conditional on any nursing home use. Models included annual event-time indicators specified as years until or since MLTC implementation. To capture MLTC effects for dual enrollees relative to non-dual Medicare enrollees, models included interaction terms for dual enrollment and event-time indicators. RESULTS This sample included 463947 Medicare beneficiaries with dementia who lived in New York State between 2011 and 2019 (50.2% younger than 85 years; 64.4% women). Implementation of MLTC was associated with lower odds of nursing home use among dual enrollees, ranging from 8% lower odds 2 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]) to 24% lower odds 6 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.84]). Compared with a scenario of no MLTC, MLTC implementation was associated with an 8% reduction in annual days of nursing home use between 2013 and 2019 (mean, -5.6 [95% CI, -6.1 to -5.1] days per year). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cohort study suggest that implementation of mandatory MLTC in New York State was associated with less nursing home use among dual enrollees with dementia and that MLTC may help prevent or delay nursing home placement among older adults with dementia.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Unmet Needs of Community-Residing Persons with Dementia and Their Informal Caregivers: Findings from the Maximizing Independence at Home Study [J].
Black, Betty S. ;
Johnston, Deirdre ;
Rabins, Peter V. ;
Morrison, Ann ;
Lyketsos, Constantine ;
Samus, Quincy M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2013, 61 (12) :2087-2095
[2]   Long-Term Services and Supports Use Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries in Rural and Urban Areas [J].
Coburn, Andrew F. ;
Ziller, Erika C. ;
Paluso, Nathan ;
Thayer, Deborah ;
Talbot, Jean A. .
RESEARCH ON AGING, 2019, 41 (03) :241-264
[3]  
Fabius C D., 2021, Community-based long-term services and supports: Are the needs of older adults and their caregivers being met
[4]   US Prevalence And Predictors Of Informal Caregiving For Dementia [J].
Friedman, Esther M. ;
Shih, Regina A. ;
Langa, Kenneth M. ;
Hurd, Michael D. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2015, 34 (10) :1637-1641
[5]   2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures [J].
Gaugler, Joseph ;
James, Bryan ;
Johnson, Tricia ;
Reimer, Jessica ;
Solis, Michele ;
Weuve, Jennifer ;
Buckley, Rachel F. ;
Hohman, Timothy J. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2022, 18 (04) :700-789
[6]   Comparison of methods to identify long term care nursing home residence with administrative data [J].
Goodwin, James S. ;
Li, Shuang ;
Zhou, Jie ;
Graham, James E. ;
Karmarkar, Amol ;
Ottenbacher, Kenneth .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
[7]   A National Examination Of Long-Term Care Setting, Outcomes, And Disparities Among Elderly Dual Eligibles [J].
Gorges, Rebecca J. ;
Sanghavi, Prachi ;
Konetzka, R. Tamara .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (07) :1110-1118
[8]  
Kasten J., 2017, WHO ENROLLS MEDICAID
[9]   Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles [J].
Konetzka, R. Tamara ;
Jung, Daniel H. ;
Gorges, Rebecca J. ;
Sanghavi, Prachi .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 (06) :973-982
[10]  
Lepore M., 2017, Living Arrangements of People with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Implications for Services and Support